On Sep 11, 9:59 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snip]
> With that, Kangax reply suggests that there is no 1 source, but each
> dev has there own version. I think that's what he said.
Not exactly.
JDD's fork has some experimental patches that can not be in the core
for certain r
"Yep. You REALLY did miss the point of my question."
Erm. Um? Ok?
(wtf?lolzers!!!)
You're not the sharpest nor understanding tool in the box obviously.
Well I'm out of this thread since my presence is obviously not
appreciated.
On Sep 11, 1:33 pm, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
2008/9/11 T.J. Crowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hey Richard,
>
> This is one of those rare situations where you're probably better off
> asking over in the core group's group (I'll provide the link although
> I'm sure you know it!):
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/topics
>
> FWIW,
Hey Richard,
This is one of those rare situations where you're probably better off
asking over in the core group's group (I'll provide the link although
I'm sure you know it!):
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/topics
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Sep 11, 11:2
2008/9/11 bluezehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Not sure what you mean. If you just want to see prototype/
> scriptaculous' source, then since javascript is an interpreted
> language, by definition you already have it just by downloading it.
>
> On Sep 11, 10:36 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Not sure what you mean. If you just want to see prototype/
scriptaculous' source, then since javascript is an interpreted
language, by definition you already have it just by downloading it.
On Sep 11, 10:36 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/9/10 Lighthouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED
