Hi
On Mar 24, 4:54 pm, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
It's late, but I have to ask something though that it still don't
understand. Why *doesn't* prototype just add a reference to the parent-class
in subclasses? Like
klass.prototype.superclass = superclass
...in Class.Create. Is it
It's late, but I have to ask something though that it still don't
understand. Why *doesn't* prototype just add a reference to the parent-class
in subclasses? Like
klass.prototype.superclass = superclass
...in Class.Create. Is it because the *this*-reference would go out of
scope?
--
You
i'd been kicking the sand wondering if i should go ahead and ask you
to re-post that link, because i'd seen it months ago and then lost it.
Glad this came up again (as i'm sure it will in the future) so i could
just jump at the link and say thank you.
And you're exactly right about the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:30 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.comwrote:
Prototype's magical `$super` comes at a marked runtime cost
Just want to point out that the marked runtime cost is only at class
definition time, not instance creation nor method call time. So yeah, the
performance
Thanks a lot TJ that helps!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi again,
Sorry for the double-post, somehow I managed to forget to say: My
mechanism isn't just (slightly) more long-winded, it's also more
complex to understand -- it demands more of the programmer. That's its
real downside, not the trivial difference in the length of
