[Proto-Scripty] Re: pass object as function argument - bind?

2008-10-17 Thread Trevan Richins
pancakes wrote: > I have searched around for some answer to this and I have a feeling I > could make it work using bind(), but I'm not sure - I'm not exactly > understanding the examples and explanations in regard to my example. > > I am returning a json object from the server/ajax. I am buildin

[Proto-Scripty] Re: pass object as function argument - bind?

2008-10-17 Thread pancakes
fyi - this works great! In my case, I am simply looking for a reference to the attributes of the json object that was returned - but thanks for the comments. here's how I used this technique (a simplified version where we populate an img tag with a thumbnail - which can populate another block wit

[Proto-Scripty] Re: pass object as function argument - bind?

2008-10-17 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi again, I will just mention that if you start using logic objects and such on the client side where the handler is a "method" of the logic object, then this becomes more problematic, since you have two different things you want to do with "this": Refer to the logic instance, and refer to the '

[Proto-Scripty] Re: pass object as function argument - bind?

2008-10-17 Thread suki rosen
that's great. thanks - I'm glad I was on the right track there. This seems very useful for dealing with ajax data. On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, T.J. Crowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hi, > > > Is this what bind() is for? Can I *bind* my json object to a function > > that refers back to

[Proto-Scripty] Re: pass object as function argument - bind?

2008-10-17 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi, > Is this what bind() is for? Can I *bind* my json object to a function > that refers back to the original object? FWIW, I'd say it's a clever use of bind(). The question of whether it's what bind() is *for* is kind of moot. (I'd say, on balance, yes it is -- bind() is for binding functio