-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 22, 2010, at 2:45 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote: > The answer is in the question. :-) If it's a non-HTTP error, it > wouldn't be best practice to use an HTTP error code to represent the > error. (Not that HTTP status codes don't have a fair bit of scope > creep in them already.)
That's what I figured, but I wanted to make sure I was on the right track ... > I've standardized by having *all* of my Ajax calls return data in the > same way. They all return JSON-formatted data, and the format for > success is always: This is similar to what I was thinking. In the end, I'll have a bit of framework I can use in other applications.. > In any given application, I tend to have a wrapper around Prototype's > ajax stuff with some problem-domain logic in it. That wrapper always > checks for the `success` flag on calls and routes to the error handler > if it's not there. Which would, I suppose, extend the framework to be even more generic.. Hrm.. Presumably this is just a simple subroutine call? Not much of a performance hit, is it? > FWIW, > -- > T.J. Crowder - --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold xenoph...@godshell.com - --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology." - - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkwiv9oACgkQ8CjzPZyTUTT8tQCeN87dhX+o0px6xNSKJJ/LbAWG kMMAn1p5Q/E47IBcxG3/LrxEDm8HH0OD =nQXW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
