Not in my memory of HTML, which begins in 1997. It's certainly
possible to put that into a browser and see something. Browsers are
designed to ignore or coerce invalid code as best they can, to
preserve the intent where possible. But there's a mile of difference
between the JavaScript DOM interpreter and the browser's HTML display
engine.
JavaScript doesn't even receive the HTML as written in code from the
browser when it's constructing its starting DOM tree, it uses the
output of the browser's first pass at munging the input code stream
into shape. This is why you can see a big difference between Firebug
and view source, for example.
So whenever you are interacting directly with the DOM, as you do in
Prototype Element#update or anything else that inserts elements into
the DOM, you are relied on to insert something that makes sense in the
context where it will be added. If you don't, you get an error or you
get ignored.
One other example of this, directly related to tables: It's perfectly
valid code to write table id=footrtdSomething/td/tr/
table, but it's more correct to write table
id=footbodytrtdSomething/td/tr/tbody/table. Most
browsers will silently add that missing intermediate element when the
page loads.
So if you wanted to get a handle on your first row, and you used $
('foo').childElements()[0] (totally made-up example) then you might
actually get a reference to the tbody -- the element you didn't
actually code!
Now you're probably smarter than that, and you'd write $
('foo').down('tr') and get what you wanted, but that's just an example
to make the point that the code you wrote isn't even guaranteed to be
the code you're going to be talking to when you start messing with the
DOM.
Walter
On Feb 16, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
Shows how outdated my HTML is. Thanks for the pointer. Its funny,
when I was googling around apparently once upon a time it was at
least tolerated, if not officially acceptable, to have div as a
child of table.
___
Jeffrey Lee
http://www.jeffreyalanlee.com
jlee...@gmail.com
On Feb 15, 2011, at 23:20 , T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi,
That HTML is invalid. You can't have a `div` as a child of `table`:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/tabular-data.html#the-table-element
If you want to subdivide a table like that, you probably want `thead`
(for your headers) and one or more `tbody` elements:
table
thead
tr
thItem/th
thTransaction Type/th
thQuantity/th
thAmount/th
thTransaction comments/th
/tr
/thead
tbody id = transList
tr
bunch of table data
/tr
tr
bunch of table data
/trtr
bunch of table data
/tr
/tbody
/table
...and then your update will have to be valid `tbody` content (e.g.,
rows).
Example:
http://jsbin.com/evuxe3
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Feb 15, 10:59 pm, Jeff jlee...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a rails generated webpage. I've created a table
definition as
follows:
table
tr
thItem/th
thTransaction Type/th
thQuantity/th
thAmount/th
thTransaction comments/th
/tr
div id = transList
tr
bunch of table data
/trtr
bunch of table data
/trtr
bunch of table data
/tr
/div
/table
If I execute a $('transList').update('Test') or frankly any other
text
or html, the existing table data remains, and the updated text is
placed above the entire table. However, if I do a view - source,
this new data doesn't show up in the page source at all, only the
old
table data.
I'm having this problem in both Safari and Firefox. Any
suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype
script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
