I agree - a central site that is easy to contribute to seems the best path.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:29 AM, T.J. Crowder <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:

> And my answer: I really like having something owned by the community,
> but I don't see much point if there's no itch to scratch. People are
> more likely to find content on the main site than in an unofficial
> wiki somewhere. As long as contributing to the site is _easy_, well-
> publicized, and not a long drawn-out process, I think we're all (core
> team, community, new adopters of Prototype) better served migrating
> the content to the main site and going that route.
>
> -- T.J. :-)
>
> On Apr 8, 2:23 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As many of you know, we've had an unofficial Prototype &
> > script.aculo.us wiki for about 18 months:
> http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/
> >
> > I have a question for the community, but first a preamble.
> >
> > Preamble:
> >
> > In the last year (more, actually), there's been precisely one edit by
> > someone other than me. :-) (Doug Reeder added an on0 handler to the
> > bulletproof ajax page.) I wrote the vast majority of the articles and
> > have been very nearly the only person maintaining them, not that
> > there's been a lot to do on that front. (Don't get the impression I
> > mind; I don't.) This suggests to me that -
> >
> > 1. We don't need a wiki
> >
> > or
> >
> > 2. We do, but it's too hard to contribute to that one because you have
> > to request access and wait for it to be granted
> >
> > As a side note: Tobie and the core team are working on moving the main
> > Prototype website to GitHub (don't worry, the URL doesn't change) from
> > the current CMS it's on (Mephisto), and Tobie says that it will be a
> > lot easier for people to contribute official content to the website
> > once that's done.
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > Do we need a wiki with user-generated content? Or should we just move
> > all of the relevant content to the Prototype website and make sure the
> > process for contributing to the website is well-publicized, easy, and
> > efficient?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > T.J. Crowder
> > Independent Software Consultant
> > tj / crowder software / comwww.crowdersoftware.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<prototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
halindr...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to