Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-07-04 Thread Richard Quadling 
On 30 June 2011 17:33, Walter Lee Davis  wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
>>
>> I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/
>> -- Richard Quadling
>> Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
>> @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea
>
>
> Thanks, that's completely a different thing from what I'm doing. I have a
> drag-to-sort widget that lets users put photos in a specific order, then
> saves that order in an Ajax callback. Scripty.Sortable does precisely that.
>
> Walter

Aha! Ok. Sorry for the noise.


-- 
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis 


On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:



I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/
--  
Richard Quadling

Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea



Thanks, that's completely a different thing from what I'm doing. I  
have a drag-to-sort widget that lets users put photos in a specific  
order, then saves that order in an Ajax callback. Scripty.Sortable  
does precisely that.


Walter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype 
& script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Phil Petree 
Ah yes.. the stacked ajax calls... kill ya every time!

Glad you got it working!

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:

> Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the
> problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was
> staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while
> that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem.
>
> Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called light
> sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous API without
> being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for simple fast drag
> sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded to that eye candy, so I
> guess Im stuck with that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Walter
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
>
>  Walter,
>>
>> I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose.  What I
>> did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/**
>> JavaScript/timer.asp 
>>
>> I created an array: var  funcTimers[]  and then modified the above code to
>> insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it
>> on exit.
>>
>> At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my
>> answer.
>>
>> Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table
>> sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column
>> clicked.  It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty
>> quickly.  I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want,
>> I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy.
>>
>> P~
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis 
>> wrote:
>> I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now
>> discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable
>> the problem goes entirely away.
>>
>> First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this
>> function is spending all of its time?
>>
>> Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue
>> I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the
>> browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow
>> script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works
>> perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very
>> snappily.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Walter
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@**
>> googlegroups.com .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+**
>> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>> group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=en
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@**
>> googlegroups.com .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+**
>> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>> group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=en
>> .
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@**
> googlegroups.com .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+**
> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
> group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=en
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Quadling 
On 30 June 2011 15:41, Walter Lee Davis  wrote:
> Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the
> problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was
> staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while
> that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem.
>
> Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called light
> sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous API without
> being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for simple fast drag
> sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded to that eye candy, so I
> guess Im stuck with that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Walter
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote:
>
>> Walter,
>>
>> I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose.  What I
>> did was hijacked the code here:
>> http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp
>>
>> I created an array: var  funcTimers[]  and then modified the above code to
>> insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it
>> on exit.
>>
>> At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my
>> answer.
>>
>> Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table
>> sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column
>> clicked.  It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty
>> quickly.  I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want,
>> I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy.
>>
>> P~
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis 
>> wrote:
>> I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now
>> discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable
>> the problem goes entirely away.
>>
>> First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this
>> function is spending all of its time?
>>
>> Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue
>> I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the
>> browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow
>> script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works
>> perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very
>> snappily.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Walter

I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/
-- 
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis 
Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the  
problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was  
staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening  
while that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the  
problem.


Somewhere on one of my computers I have a copy of a framework called  
light sortable or lite sortable, which aims to ape the Scriptaculous  
API without being so heavy. It eschews the fancy animation effects for  
simple fast drag sorting. But my page (and client) are pretty wedded  
to that eye candy, so I guess Im stuck with that.


Thanks,

Walter

On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Phil Petree wrote:


Walter,

I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose.   
What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp


I created an array: var  funcTimers[]  and then modified the above  
code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on  
entry and ended it on exit.


At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my  
answer.


Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a  
table sort function that would sort a standard html table based on  
the column clicked.  It was quite fast and would sort through 1000  
columns pretty quickly.  I looked on my backup drive and couldnt  
find it but if you want, I'll root around and post it might give  
you a different strategy.


P~

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis  
 wrote:
I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now  
discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list  
sortable the problem goes entirely away.


First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this  
function is spending all of its time?


Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The  
issue I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is  
called, the browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an  
alert about the slow script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it)  
the page loads and works perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's  
supposed to do, and very snappily.


Thanks in advance,

Walter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com 
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en 
.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com 
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype 
& script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Phil Petree 
Walter,

I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose.  What I did
was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp

I created an array: var  funcTimers[]  and then modified the above code to
insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry and ended it
on exit.

At the end, I dumped the funcTimers out with an alert() and I had my answer.

Also, about 10 years ago (when I was younger and smarter) I wrote a table
sort function that would sort a standard html table based on the column
clicked.  It was quite fast and would sort through 1000 columns pretty
quickly.  I looked on my backup drive and couldnt find it but if you want,
I'll root around and post it might give you a different strategy.

P~

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:

> I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered
> that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem
> goes entirely away.
>
> First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function
> is spending all of its time?
>
> Second, is there any way to get around these slow script errors? The issue
> I am seeing is that once the page loads, and this function is called, the
> browser goes into beachball mode, eventually shows an alert about the slow
> script. If I okay that (keep trying, I tell it) the page loads and works
> perfectly. Sortable does exactly what it's supposed to do, and very
> snappily.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Walter
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@**
> googlegroups.com .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+**
> unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
> group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=en
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.