I forgot to send out an email about this earlier, but the OreSat structure meeting on this particular Saturday isn't going to be a thing. That's because the march for science is a thing at the same time. Sorry for the super short notice.
On Apr 16, 2017 10:35 AM, "Jeremy Louke" <jalo...@gmail.com> wrote: yeah, that's why I didn't push it too hard, we already use enough programs. However I think it may be beneficial in this case to transfer all CAD to grabCAD, and leave github to the electrical engineers and programmers. I sent you an invite to the grabCAD project I made for oresat. go ahead and download the desktop app, and play with it and let me know what you think. the march for science should be pretty good, I am excited for it. On Apr 16, 2017 10:06 AM, "Joseph Shields" <shiel...@pdx.edu> wrote: > it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the sense that it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of the most useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it locks that file from other users editing it. Yeah, that may be a good solution. I'm a little wary of bringing in *even more* tools, but it would be good to have something other than "let's agree to only edit these parts". > march for science Agh, that's right. It's the same day and time here too... -- Joe Shields <https://joedang.github.io/> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Jeremy Louke <jalo...@gmail.com> wrote: > if there is a problem with conflicts because of a lot of people working on > an assembly, it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the > sense that it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of > the most useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it > locks that file from other users editing it. I set it up with a previous > revision of the Oresat structure, but I never really utilized it because i > was the only one doing the CAD back then. I was however thinking of having > both PSAS and Oresat switch all CAD to grabCAD at one point because it is > better suited to CAD than github. > > Maybe it's something we should revisit with so many people all working on > one assembly. > > I unfortunately won't be able to join this weekend, as I am going to the > march for science in LA. > > > On Apr 16, 2017 7:46 AM, "Joseph Shields" <shiel...@pdx.edu> wrote: > >> It looks like the best time for the OreSat structure meeting would be >> Saturday morning. So, let’s plan to meet at *10 am on Saturday* in the >> rocket room and/or the hangout <http://psas.pdx.edu/hangout>. >> >> I added some later times to the poll and forgot to tell anyone. So, if >> you really want the meeting to be at one of those later times, I guess you >> can give a holla. >> >> I think the main stuff we want to do at this meeting is help each other >> with any clarifications and *pick some parts to convert before the next >> meeting*. (It might also be good to talk about what we plan to change, >> so we don’t constantly create merge conflicts with the assemblies. We could >> also just use branches for this.) >> day time max yes maybe max non-no >> Thu. 12-2 pm 4 1 4 >> Fri. 6-7 pm 4 0 4 >> *Sat.* *10 am-1 pm* 4 2 *5* >> Sat. 4-7 pm 4 0 4 >> Sun. 5-7 pm 4 0 4 >> >> The reason for choosing this time is to get all the people who are >> working on converting the model to attend. (And also just to get the >> maximum number of people to attend.) >> >> >> -- Joe Shields <https://joedang.github.io/> >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Joseph Shields <shiel...@pdx.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hey airframe list, >>> We need to pick a new time for the OreSat strucutre meeting >>> <http://doodle.com/poll/5esq23qxci38zwvw>, since the old one doesn’t >>> work any more didn’t work. As usual, this isn’t a poll for the >>> *specific* days you’re free, but rather the *day’s of the week* you’re >>> usually free. >>> >>> In the near future this is just a time to all sit down with SolidWorks >>> and get each other unstuck or assign parts to migrate. In the less near >>> future, this is about designing the antenna deployment. >>> >>> -- Joe Shields <https://joedang.github.io/> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> psas-airframe mailing list >> psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu >> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe >> >>
_______________________________________________ psas-airframe mailing list psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe
