Hi Glenn! > * As appropriate each subsystem board would have it's own custom > "FlatSat Support Breakout" board (FSB) board.
Yes, I think this is a given. The ability to break out a board is important. To that end, I'm toying with the idea of a standard debug connector that attaches to the FSB. Probably a bad idea, actually, since all the boards are different, but... we'll chat about it Friday. > * The FSB should allow the subsystem to be tested independently... Yep. > * The FSB should should allow us take the subsystem in a fully running > state into testing environments such as Thermal-Vacuum, Vibration, > RF, various bench tests, etc, without interfering with the test. That's a very good point. > * The FSB should not introduce any side effects to the FlatSat when > connected into it. Yes, and good luck to us with that :) We'll discuss this in depth on Friday, and try to come up with our first "FSB" requirements for the solar boards and the upcoming battery cards. Andrew -- ------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Greenberg Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University http://www.ece.pdx.edu/ a...@ece.pdx.edu C: 503.708.7711 ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
