Hi Devrim,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 21:49, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> You folks also should talk to the RPM and deb packagers before making
> the final decision ;)
>
> RPM packager speaking: This change does not seem to hurt us.
Thank you, good call.
Package-wise, is there anything else we might do
Hi,
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 15:05 +0200, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> That's a good point; so I agree moving to psycopg makes sense.
You folks also should talk to the RPM and deb packagers before making
the final decision ;)
RPM packager speaking: This change does not seem to hurt us.
Regards,
--
De
Am Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 03:05:46PM +0200 schrieb Denis Laxalde:
> >>psycopg2 version 2.x.y
> >>psycopg version 3.w.z
>
> That's a good point; so I agree moving to psycopg makes sense.
+1
Karsten
--
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
Daniele Varrazzo a écrit :
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 08:47, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Reading all the messages I have second toughts. If psycopg2 is here to
stay, i.e., if it will not be completely replaced by "psycopg3" (and by
completely I mean shutting down everything about it) then we will
