Hmmm, I dunno man, when I'm already dealing with sessions that have
high enough track counts as to feel cumbersome, adding a new one for
each take doesn't seem to improve the workflow all that much here, it
just delays the inevitable. I'd probably end up doing even more button
bashing comping the
Absolutely, Working with the play lists allows two things, you can
keep focus on the play list in the edit window, and use the track
table in the mix window to quickly select tracks. My favorite feature
of PT on a mac is being able to keep focus in two different windows!
It's extremely easy to
I take a slightly different approach. If it's a track I know I'll use
playlists on, I usually leave the first playlist blank and comp onto
that. Main reason being that when PT assigns numbers to playlists,
then the playlist numbers PT adds on stay in sync with the number of
the take. For some
I can certainly see how that could be helpful to some, but since I'm very
specific with my names I don't even pay attention to the number the voiceover
reads when going through the playlist manager. I name so specifically that in
my notes I can write down exactly which playlist I may have like
More power to you man, the more organised the better! If you ever
fancy putting up a post about the naming conventions you use, I'd be
interested.
Scott
On 10/2/13, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote:
I can certainly see how that could be helpful to some, but since I'm very
specific with
