Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-08 Thread Poppa Bear
Another difference is that HD is 192 KHZ, but some say that it doesn't make a difference when it comes to commercial music. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:17 AM Subject: Re: PT vs PT HD Hi Jon

PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread CHUCK REICHEL
Hi Jon, For my self its one word! LATENCY :) YMMV CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com www.SoundPictureRecording.com 954-742-0019 GUFFAWING :) In GOD I Trust On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote: What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins? Can I mix in surround without HD? Sent from my phone On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jon, Aside from 0 latency,

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Poppa Bear
Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
with reverb and compression. The reverb does often help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a mixed down product will feel like. Message - From: Jon Solitro To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
- From: Jon Solitro To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a mixed down product will feel like. Message - From: Jon Solitro To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Ricky Prevatte
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
- From: Jon Solitro To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a mixed down product will feel like. Message - From: Jon Solitro To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD