Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-07 Thread Chris Smart
yep, while on a tech support call for other issues, I asked Anthony at Slate tech support to make me up some presets with various modules in various orders. That gives me the ability to just tweek from there. At 10:05 AM 5/7/2015, you wrote: Good morning, if you can get someone to drag the mod

Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-07 Thread Chris Smart
I have no idea how it works on ProTools, but all the important mix rack parameters are exposed to my VST host, in this case, Sonar. So yes, you can probably get at things. At 03:41 AM 5/7/2015, you wrote: I should have been more clear, I was asking about accessing the mix rack with Voice over

Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-07 Thread mcdiemert .
Good morning, if you can get someone to drag the moduals in the VMr, you can create presets tfor each individual VCC component. Right now, I have a preset for RC tube and revival and working this way allows me to adjust the parameters for these two moduals. HTH. On 5/7/15, Brian Casey wrote: > I

Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-07 Thread Brian Casey
I should have been more clear, I was asking about accessing the mix rack with Voice over rather than the merrits of vcc itself. It sounds like mix rack may not be accessible and that is the only way to use vcc 2.0 and newer slate offerings it seems. My desk is an Allen and Heath gsr24 to answer

Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-06 Thread Chris Smart
well it's up to you whether the VMR is worth it or not. VCC 2.0 does have new algorithms and now appears in VCC as another module. Just curious, which desk do you have? At 07:30 PM 5/6/2015, you wrote: Hi guys, so to revive an old thread, is it pointless downloading the virtual mix rack plug t

Re: Slate digital question

2015-05-06 Thread CaseyBrian Casey
Hi guys, so to revive an old thread, is it pointless downloading the virtual mix rack plug to use my vcc on the mac? At least I still have my VBC but I droppped a few bucks on vcc. At least I have a real desk now so am less bothered about using VCC. On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:37:04 PM UTC+1

Re: Slate digital question

2015-04-13 Thread Gary Readfern-Gray
I have the VBC, they are beautifully accessible. I think this may be because they can be used stand-alone instead of having to be used in a rack. On 4/13/15, mcdiemert . wrote: > They are typically a mixed bag. > The VTM is fairly usable not much success with the old VCC and FGX. > The new versio

Re: Slate digital question

2015-04-13 Thread mcdiemert .
They are typically a mixed bag. The VTM is fairly usable not much success with the old VCC and FGX. The new version of VCC is in VMR if i'm not mistaken. If you create presets for yourself it is usable. On 4/13/15, Brian Howerton wrote: > Hello all, > For those of you that use Slate digital prod

Slate digital question

2015-04-13 Thread Brian Howerton
Hello all, For those of you that use Slate digital products, how are they as far as accessibility with PT? I used the VCC and the VTM on windows, but I am installing them now on my mac to use with pro tools, just was curious as to what others who use these plugins think of them. Thanks, Brian