Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-30 Thread Brian Casey
. -- From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:39 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hi Brian, I don't think anybody is saying Apple are passing the buck here

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-30 Thread Gordon Kent
of the recognized items, that may help some. Gord -Original Message- From: Scott Chesworth Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:39 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hi Brian, I don't think anybody is saying Apple are passing the buck

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-30 Thread Scott Chesworth
, that may help some. Gord -Original Message- From: Scott Chesworth Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:39 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hi Brian, I don't think anybody is saying Apple are passing the buck here. There approach

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-30 Thread Scott Chesworth
. -- From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:39 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hi Brian, I don't think anybody is saying Apple are passing the buck here

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-30 Thread Brian Casey
dirty with it. Cheers, Brian. -- From: Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:24 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hey Brian, So far as I know, there isn't

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-29 Thread David Eagle
a sampler of some sort. I like xpand though, at least we have access to the envelopes and it's simple and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-29 Thread Brian Casey
with jaws! lol. But I do love my iPhone! Brian. -- From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 8:31 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Hi brian, While the scripting idea

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-29 Thread Scott Chesworth
, at least we have access to the envelopes and it's simple and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-29 Thread Gordon Kent
. -- From: David Eagle onlineea...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 7:52 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing Yes, I was planning on saying something similar. What we really need is a way of creating accessibility for ourselves

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-28 Thread David Eagle
AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's preset librarian, and you can edit them through the visible automation

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-28 Thread Scott Chesworth
a sampler of some sort. I like xpand though, at least we have access to the envelopes and it's simple and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-20 Thread David Eagle
access to the envelopes and it's simple and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-20 Thread David Eagle
-Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-20 Thread Chuck Reichel
instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's preset librarian, and you can edit them through the visible automation parameters. There are some exceptions. Structure and Structure LE

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-18 Thread David Eagle
and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-18 Thread Scott Chesworth
Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's preset librarian

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-13 Thread Bryan Smart
, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's preset librarian, and you can edit them through the visible

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-12 Thread Bryan Smart
No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug in window's preset librarian, and you can edit them through the visible automation parameters. There are some exceptions. Structure and Structure LE are 100% out. You must use their

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-12 Thread Gordon Kent
and straightforward. Gord -Original Message- From: Bryan Smart Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Software instruments and precise editing No, I said that I'd had luck. Most of the Avid instruments are accessible. They show their presets in the plug

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-08 Thread Tim Elder
Hi Brian, You say others have had luck with the accessibility of Avid virtual instruments. Can you further describe the relative accessibility of the Avid instruments? I was considering an investment in the PT virtual instrument collection. As of now I still do most synth programming in Sonar

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-08 Thread Monkey Pusher
Does this mean tools like Beat Detective are accessible? On 6/8/11, Tim Elder t...@timeldermusic.com wrote: Hi Brian, You say others have had luck with the accessibility of Avid virtual instruments. Can you further describe the relative accessibility of the Avid instruments? I was

Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-07 Thread Stefan Albertshauser
Hello, I'm about to purcase pro tools. I didn't find two questions on the list: 1. I wonder, if it is possible for us to navigate to zero-crossings, like in sonar. 2. How do you use software instruments like Contact, where the buttons to load files, I think, aren't automatable?

Re: Software instruments and precise editing

2011-06-07 Thread Slau Halatyn
Hi stefan, The idea of zero crossing is irrelevant in Pro Tools since it is possible to not only define automatic crossfades but, even if an edit is very rough, a crossfade is simple to make across any region boundaries. HTH, Slau On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Bryan Smart wrote: Regarding