Hi Frank,
If you don't have an interface connected, the default output is apparently set
to the Pro Tools Aggregate Device. By default, VoiceOver will come through the
computer's output and Pro Tools will output through the interface. Again,
that's assuming the interface's drivers are
Hi all,
Great news about PT9, but my question kind of relates to Frank's and routing
Voice over.
I'll be doing some work on a HD system over the next few months, and need to
have a think about how I'll route Voice over into the control room. The Mac
pro is inside a machine room just off the
Hey herman. Whenever you get that weird problem with showing only comment
fields, just close the mix window and reopen. Sometimes tracks are sized weird
and nothing is seen. Once you reopen the mix window, all will be well.
On Nov 16, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
Hey Herman,
If I
Hi Brian,
Here is what I did for routing VoiceOver to my control room
I was considering using an Digital Coax Optical Toslink to Analog
Audio Converter
But went with the most direct clean way to do it..
From my amp closet I split the Audio out from my mac pro quad core
with a Y jack..
Then
I guess I've come to realize that there's an inherent conflict between Pro
Tools and voiceOver as it relates to Core Audio. VoiceOver uses Core Audio
(built-in system audio) for its output. Pro Tools will not playback through
Core Audio if anything else is sharing it. In other words, the two
Hi. A USB headset would be a cheap work around as it would come up as a
second I/O device. (If one would rather spend twenty or thirty dollars as
opposed to a hundred or two hundred etc.)
Cameron.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
I suppose that's true and, for what it's worth, if I'm working off a USB device
with VoiceOver routed through the speakers or vice versa, it would probably do
the job well enough. I'll give it a try.
Slau
On Nov 19, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Cameron wrote:
Hi. A USB headset would be a cheap work
