Re: pth_uctx_* (was: Re: pth_msgport_create() and pth_mctx_*())

2002-11-07 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:02:53AM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002, Matthew Mondor wrote: Yes, that is also why I suggest to perhaps provide an SVR4/SUS like interface, which could consist of C functions... and then exported and documented. The API is already

pth_uctx_* (was: Re: pth_msgport_create() and pth_mctx_*())

2002-11-03 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002, Matthew Mondor wrote: [...exporting pth_mctx functionality...] Yes, the same idea is also on my TODO list. Unfortunately it is perhaps not as easy as it looks, because some of the pth_mctx_*() stuff is just macro based and hence exporting it means moving it