On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Kevin Ruland wrote:
Bertram,
Things like static type checking may be optional (to the workflow) in
the sense that one could still execute a workflow without having done
the static type checking step or perhaps the workflow could be executed
if static type checking
No problem ... I thought you were referring to structural types -- int,
string, array of double, etc. I agree with Bertram that structural type
checking would be very useful to have has a button akin to a staging
button, a run button, a stop button, and so on. The semantic type stuff
is not
At 08:41 AM 1/30/2006 -0600, Kevin Ruland wrote:
Also, if some actor somewhere does do something extremely time consuming
in it's initialize method, there is currently no pleasant way to interrupt
it. The user can click on the stop button, and it does appear to have
some effect -- that is,
Edward A. Lee wrote:
At 08:41 AM 1/30/2006 -0600, Kevin Ruland wrote:
Also, if some actor somewhere does do something extremely time
consuming in it's initialize method, there is currently no pleasant
way to interrupt it. The user can click on the stop button, and it
does appear to have some
