Re: [ptxdist] AT91SAM9263-ek

2012-06-28 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2012/6/28 Stutz Sven : > Hello to everyone, > > I have an evaluation board (at91sam9263-ek Rev. B) from Atmel and I am > trying now to get a customized OS running on this board. > > As I read in the manual, that I need for that purpose  a special BSP for > this eval. board. > But where can I g

[ptxdist] [PATCH] install optional symlinks from sendmail to ssmtp

2012-06-28 Thread Alexander Dahl
This patch adds an option to create /usr/sbin/sendmail as symlink to ssmtp which has the same calling options. This is what Debian does as well and it's helpful for other daemons using sendmail to send system mail. Note: the current ssmtp package doesn't set PREFIX at all so the binary goes to /sb

Re: [ptxdist] AT91SAM9263-ek

2012-06-28 Thread Stutz Sven
Hi out there, I am trying to build an image with at91bootstrap and u-boot respectively barebox (as it is recommended from Pengutronix). But during this compile process I get one Error: LD barebox lib/built-in.o: In function `register_device': show_progress.c:(.text.register_device+0x40):

Re: [ptxdist] AT91SAM9263-ek

2012-06-28 Thread Stutz Sven
Am 28.06.2012 09:52, schrieb Alexander Dahl: Hei hei, Am 2012-06-28 08:42, schrieb Stutz Sven: Further more to boot this image on the hardware, do I really have to use at91bootstrap to load barebox and then barebox to load the kernel? And to run this image in QEMU will this boot loader not infl

Re: [ptxdist] AT91SAM9263-ek

2012-06-28 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hei hei, Am 2012-06-28 08:42, schrieb Stutz Sven: > Further more to boot this image on the hardware, do I really have to > use at91bootstrap to load barebox and then barebox to load the kernel? > And to run this image in QEMU will this boot loader not influence the system? We use at91bootstrap an

Re: [ptxdist] AT91SAM9263-ek

2012-06-28 Thread Robert Schwebel
Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:42:31AM +0200, Stutz Sven wrote: > I have an evaluation board (at91sam9263-ek Rev. B) from Atmel and I am > trying now to get a customized OS running on this board. > > As I read in the manual, that I need for that purpose a special BSP > for this eval. board. But