Hi Michael
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:34:14PM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is correct but gcc reports the wrong name.
This is a bug in the toolchain. It's fixed in git and I'm currently
collecting other issued that I want to fix for a 2012.12.1 release.
Mh, i have
Hi Andreas,
Well, as I thought, so please try my step by step guide.
Sorry, at the first reading I have your step guide.
I have followed your step guide, and git creates a now patch file in the
format you described (GIT binary patch) and added it to the series file.
Very nice. Is the
Hi Matthias,
On 29.01.2013 09:39, Matthias Klein wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Well, as I thought, so please try my step by step guide.
Sorry, at the first reading I have your step guide.
I have followed your step guide, and git creates a now patch file in the
format you described (GIT binary
Andreas Bießmann wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:39, Matthias Klein wrote:
Well, as I thought, so please try my step by step guide.
Sorry, at the first reading I have your step guide.
I have followed your step guide, and git creates a now patch file in the
format you described (GIT binary
Hi Juergen,
Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary patches again,
but not
the 'patch' tool.
Does that mean that the normal ptxdist extract step does not support
binary patches (only ptxdist extract --git) ?
Best regards,
Matthias
--
ptxdist mailing list
* Juergen Beisert j...@pengutronix.de [2013-01-29 11:20]:
Andreas Bießmann wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:39, Matthias Klein wrote:
Well, as I thought, so please try my step by step guide.
Sorry, at the first reading I have your step guide.
I have followed your step guide, and git
Hi Matthias,
On 29.01.2013 11:26, Matthias Klein wrote:
Hi Juergen,
Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary patches again,
but not
the 'patch' tool.
Does that mean that the normal ptxdist extract step does not support
binary patches (only ptxdist extract --git) ?
Oups, it
* Andreas Bießmann andreas.biessm...@corscience.de [2013-01-29 12:12]:
On 29.01.2013 11:26, Matthias Klein wrote:
Hi Juergen,
Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary patches again,
but not
the 'patch' tool.
Does that mean that the normal ptxdist extract step does not
* Bernhard Walle bernh...@bwalle.de [2013-01-29 13:06]:
* Andreas Bießmann andreas.biessm...@corscience.de [2013-01-29 12:12]:
On 29.01.2013 11:26, Matthias Klein wrote:
Hi Juergen,
Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary patches again,
but not
the 'patch' tool.
* Matthias Klein matthias.kl...@optimeas.de [2013-01-28 15:38]:
my intension is to create a patch file (containing the firmware)
which will be applied at the kernel.prepare step using the series
file.
(Then at the kernel.compile step the firmware should be compiled
into the kernel.)
Hi Bernhard,
On 29.01.2013 13:30, Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Bernhard Walle bernh...@bwalle.de [2013-01-29 13:06]:
* Andreas Bießmann andreas.biessm...@corscience.de [2013-01-29 12:12]:
On 29.01.2013 11:26, Matthias Klein wrote:
Hi Juergen,
Maybe only git itself is able to apply its own binary
* Andreas Bießmann andreas.biessm...@corscience.de [2013-01-29 14:29]:
The 'fallback' for git in PTXdist (in fact the default setup) is quilt,
isn't it?
Only if it's present. If not, it falls back to plain 'patch'.
Okay, supported only means that it recognizes it and complains that it
[Bernhard Walle bernh...@bwalle.de 29.01.2013 14:12:11]
Because I have the same problem I used another solution: Create a
directory local_src/firmware, copy the binary files there and
set in the kernel configuration
Device drivers ---
Generic Driver Options ---
[*] Include in-kernel
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:35:55AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
Your help in this is greatly appreciated.
To my knowledge the Qt5 is not yet integrated into ptxdist? Or is
there some qt5 work in progress? I don't have much free time but i
would work on rpi integration if there is some starting
On 29-1-2013 16:38, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:35:55AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
Your help in this is greatly appreciated.
To my knowledge the Qt5 is not yet integrated into ptxdist? Or is
there some qt5 work in progress? I don't have much free time but i
would work on
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 06:09:49PM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
This package provides utils to set up ieee802.15.4 devices.
Add option do not install test-utils. These test-utils depends
on python. Currently the buildsystem of lowpan-tools can't
disable building of test-tools, which makes a
16 matches
Mail list logo
