[ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

Hallo Together, We are fighting sporadic segmentation fault and illegal instruction crashes of standard shell commands like lsusb, lsmod, cp, du etc. on a rootfs build with ptxdist and OSELAS-Toolchains. The problems seem to disappear when we use a different Toolchain (ELDK). Any ideas of

Re: [ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

Hi Arno Am 17.01.2014 11:16, schrieb Arno Euteneuer: We are fighting sporadic segmentation fault and illegal instruction crashes of standard shell commands like lsusb, lsmod, cp, du etc. on a rootfs build with ptxdist and OSELAS-Toolchains. The problems seem to disappear when we use a different

Re: [ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

Hi Arno, On Friday 17 January 2014 11:16:02 Arno Euteneuer wrote: [...] A while ago we noticed that commands like e.g. lsmod would sometimes crash on the target with an Illegal Instruction or segfault, just to work correctly again in the next second. Also we sometimes got kicked out of our

Re: [ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

Hi Jürgen, [...] Is there a correlation between the memory size the kernel gets reported and the used memory devices soldered onto the board? ;) [...] I hope there is a very strong correlation ;-) We have 256MB DDR2 RAM and 512MB NAND flash and get the following: root@dlcpro:~ cat

Re: [ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

Hi Tim, I discovered similar problems on an AM37xx and OMAP35xx with Linux 3.4 and 3.3. Any ideas of what could be wrong will be highly appreciated. Did you try to activate all the Kernel Arm-Errata? At least for OMAP3503D we figured out that it suffers from more than what the Kernel-Doc

Re: [ptxdist] sporadic crashes of shell commands

On Friday 17 January 2014 13:50:45 Arno Euteneuer wrote: Hi Jürgen, [...] Is there a correlation between the memory size the kernel gets reported and the used memory devices soldered onto the board? ;) [...] I hope there is a very strong correlation ;-) :) We have 256MB DDR2 RAM

[ptxdist] [PATCH] openssl: version bump 1.0.0k - 1.0.1e

Updating openssl to 1.0.1e improves TLS 1.x support in lighttpd. Signed-off-by: Bruno Thomsen b...@kamstrup.dk --- rules/openssl.make |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rules/openssl.make b/rules/openssl.make index 35e9aa5..eaeb95a 100644 ---

Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] openssl: version bump 1.0.0k - 1.0.1e

Hi Bruno, On Friday 17 January 2014 14:49:58 Bruno Thomsen wrote: Updating openssl to 1.0.1e improves TLS 1.x support in lighttpd. Signed-off-by: Bruno Thomsen b...@kamstrup.dk --- rules/openssl.make |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[ptxdist] [ANNOUNCE] PTXdist 2014.01.0 released

Hi, I'm happy to announce that I've just released ptxdist-2014.01.0. Like last month this is mostly a bugfix release. There is one significant change: We have a new 'staging' submenu. This is for packages that are not really maintained and are starting to break. I've started to move packages

Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] openssl: version bump 1.0.0k - 1.0.1e

Hi Juergen, PTXdist comes with various patches for openssl-1.0.0k. Did you check if they are obsolete when updating to release 1.0.1e? If yes, you should remove them with your patch as well. Ups, I was using the openssl-1.0.0h patch series when testing 1.0.1e. I will try to

[ptxdist] [PATCH 2/2] ptxdist getdev: Download dev packages from ${PTXCONF_SETUP_DEVMIRROR}

From: Jon Ringle jrin...@gridpoint.com There's probably clean up to be done with this, but here goes... :) This patch allows you to setup a dev package mirror to hold *-dev.tar.gz packages. Upload your *-dev.tar.gz packages to your mirror, then you can avoid rebuilding all your packages by