Am 23.04.14 14:52, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
>> > Bernhard, I realized this code is on your server. Would you build a
>> > new version with this attached patch applied?
> Bernhard, you created a tarball. Are you our upstream or is this from
> somewhere else?
No, it's from the git tree. Don't ask me
Hello,
Am 23.04.14 12:02, schrieb Andreas Bießmann:
>
> anything wrong with this patch?
> Bernhard, I realized this code is on your server. Would you build a new
> version with this attached patch applied?
It doesn't make sense. I just uploaded a git snapshot to make it
available via HTTP. I can
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:02:41PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> anything wrong with this patch?
I remember looking at the patch, but it seems I never wrote a reply.
It's a bit ugly, because from what I can tell 'returnif' is called more
than once for some errors.
I don't really have a str
Hi,
anything wrong with this patch?
Bernhard, I realized this code is on your server. Would you build a new
version with this attached patch applied?
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
Am 2013-10-15 12:58, schrieb Andreas Bießmann:
flashbench may end without any comment on error in setup (mostly
ping ...
On 10/15/2013 12:58 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> flashbench may end without any comment on error in setup (mostly ENOMEM on
> allocating scratch buffer).
> To avoid others searching again add strerror(3) to give a hint to the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
> ---
> .../0003-
flashbench may end without any comment on error in setup (mostly ENOMEM on
allocating scratch buffer).
To avoid others searching again add strerror(3) to give a hint to the user.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
---
.../0003-flashbench-printout-error.patch | 33
p
