Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-04-09 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 07:13:00AM -0500, Crim, Jason wrote: > I'd noticed that the cortexa8 toolchain was not available when I was starting > to set up a new test build-environment with the latest versions. We're using > the TI AM3352. The v7a toolchain works just fine with this CPU. You can

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-04-09 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:41:38PM -0500, Crim, Jason wrote: > I've got my toolchain switched to the arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf (from the > arm-cortexa8-linux-gnueabihf), and valgrind is now working. It complains > about _armv7_tick being an unrecognized instruction, but my program does >

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-04-05 Thread Crim, Jason
Michael, thank you for your suggestion. I've got my toolchain switched to the arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf (from the arm-cortexa8-linux-gnueabihf), and valgrind is now working. It complains about _armv7_tick being an unrecognized instruction, but my program does continue to run (in defiance of

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-03-28 Thread Crim, Jason
Andrej, Thanks for your information. My setup includes glibc 2.20 rather than the 2.16 referenced in your patch file, so I don't think it'll work directly (the source of 2.20 and 2.16 look pretty different - actually, I'm not even seeing the files referenced in the 2.16 source I pulled from

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-03-28 Thread Andrej.Gantvorg
Hi Jason, we had experienced a similar problem with the OSELAS 2012.12.1 toolchain. In our case the problem was the missing .size directive in assembler reimplementations of strlen and memcpy from the linaro cortex-strings patch for glibc. Does your "readelf -s /path/to/your/libc.so.6"

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-03-27 Thread Crim, Jason
Michael, It looks like the toolchain is configured as OSELAS.Toolchain-2014.12. I've recently been added to a team which had this existing ptxdist setup, so I've been trying to learn my way around ptxdist while trying to get valgrind enabled to test an issue. The initial run of valgrind

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-03-27 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:03:21AM -0500, Crim, Jason wrote: > I'd tried moving over the root-debug versions of the referenced files, and > was still hitting the error. That's when I'd found the post referencing > the optimization levels. I'll take a look at getting the nfs-root running >

Re: [ptxdist] Including valgrind in the configuration doesn't trigger an un-optimized build of glibc.

2018-03-26 Thread Crim, Jason
Thanks, I'd tried moving over the root-debug versions of the referenced files, and was still hitting the error. That's when I'd found the post referencing the optimization levels. I'll take a look at getting the nfs-root running when I've got some time. Thanks for the information and