HI,
I always thought that it was -j"number of cores +1"
Yannick.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jon Smirl
Envoyé : vendredi 13 juin 2008 01:29
À : Marc Kleine-Budde
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ptxdist@pengutronix.de
Objet : Re: [ptxdist] [OS
On 6/12/08, Marc Kleine-Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> >> If you don't do enything, you will end up with "-j x
> 2"
> >> >> If you don't want to build a programm in parallel, edit the
> >> >> corresponding makefile, look for the compile rule and change
> >> >>
Next try:
Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> If you don't do enything, you will end up with "-j x 2"
>> >> If you don't want to build a programm in parallel, edit the
>> >> corresponding makefile, look for the compile rule and change
>> >> "$(PARALLELMFLAGS)" into "$(PARALLELMFLAGS_BROKEN)". (See attac
Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> If you don't do enything, you will end up with "-j x 2"
>> >> If you don't want to build a programm in parallel, edit the
>> >> corresponding makefile, look for the compile rule and change
>> >> "$(PARALLELMFLAGS)" into "$(PARALLELMFLAGS_BROKEN)". (See attached
>> pat
On 6/12/08, Marc Kleine-Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> let's continue on the ptxdist mailinglist!
>
>
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> >> If you don't do enything, you will end up with "-j x 2"
> >> If you don't want to build a programm in parallel, edit the
> >> corresponding makefile, lo
Hi,
let's continue on the ptxdist mailinglist!
Jon Smirl wrote:
>> If you don't do enything, you will end up with "-j x 2"
>> If you don't want to build a programm in parallel, edit the
>> corresponding makefile, look for the compile rule and change
>> "$(PARALLELMFLAGS)" into "$(PARALLELMFLA