Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter
---
rules/weston.in | 9 +
rules/weston.make | 5 -
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/weston.in b/rules/weston.in
index 56b85d26a..79512bc2a 100644
--- a/rules/weston.in
+++
Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter
---
rules/wayland-protocols.make | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rules/wayland-protocols.make b/rules/wayland-protocols.make
index 80b9c64b6..ec069fe7e 100644
--- a/rules/wayland-protocols.make
+++
Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter
---
rules/weston.in | 6 ++
rules/weston.make | 38 +++---
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rules/weston.in b/rules/weston.in
index 7db255202..56b85d26a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter
---
rules/wayland.make | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rules/wayland.make b/rules/wayland.make
index 203caa4a9..5d5e44470 100644
--- a/rules/wayland.make
+++ b/rules/wayland.make
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
Changes since v1:
- add variable LIBWESTON_MAJOR instead of splitting WESTON_VERSION
- sort installed images in alphabetical order
- drop separate config item for Weston D-Bus support
- mark WESTON_LAUNCH as broken
Michael Tretter (4):
wayland-protocols: version bump 1.12 -> 1.13
wayland:
Hello Lucas,
Thanks a lot for the info!
Best regards,
Matthias
-- Originalnachricht --
Von: "Lucas Stach"
An: ptxdist@pengutronix.de; "Matthias Klein"
Gesendet: 11.04.2018 11:42:44
Betreff: Re: [ptxdist] OSELAS Toolchain for i.MX
Hi Matthias,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2018, 09:26 + schrieb Matthias Klein:
> Hello,
>
> we are using the OSELAS Toolchain 2014.12.2 in the "arm-v7a-linux-
> gnueabihf" variant for the NXP i.MX6S7 and NXP i.MX6QP7.
>
> Can we use this existing Toolchain and the PTXdist project also for
> the
Hello,
we are using the OSELAS Toolchain 2014.12.2 in the
"arm-v7a-linux-gnueabihf" variant for the NXP i.MX6S7 and NXP i.MX6QP7.
Can we use this existing Toolchain and the PTXdist project also for the
i.MX 6UltraLite MCIMX6G2?
In other words: do we need only a different device tree (and
Ah, thank you for reminding me. It builds fine without the patches, but
I will send v2 nevertheless to delete them.
- Roland
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:56:02AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hei hei,
>
> Am Dienstag, 10. April 2018, 17:34:09 CEST schrieb Bastian Stender:
> > There are patches
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:56:02AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 10. April 2018, 17:34:09 CEST schrieb Bastian Stender:
> > There are patches on top of htop 2.1.0. You should port them or drop
> > them as needed.
>
> FWIW …
>
>
Hei hei,
Am Dienstag, 10. April 2018, 17:34:09 CEST schrieb Bastian Stender:
> There are patches on top of htop 2.1.0. You should port them or drop
> them as needed.
FWIW …
0001-linux-LinuxProcessList-fix-reading-of-number-of-read.patch was applied
upstream.
11 matches
Mail list logo