On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
They are now unused and should never be introduced again. If anything,
we want to depend on the ARM architecture, but not on specific SOCs.
We need some kind of endianess information. I guess ARCH_ARM should select
Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
They are now unused and should never be introduced again. If anything,
we want to depend on the ARM architecture, but not on specific SOCs.
We need some kind of endianess information. I guess ARCH_ARM
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:28AM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote:
Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
They are now unused and should never be introduced again. If anything,
we want to depend on the ARM architecture, but not on specific SOCs.
They are now unused and should never be introduced again. If anything,
we want to depend on the ARM architecture, but not on specific SOCs.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
platforms/architecture.in | 55 -
1 files changed, 0
2011/3/4 Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de:
They are now unused and should never be introduced again. If anything,
we want to depend on the ARM architecture, but not on specific SOCs.
OK, now I see why you want to do that :-)
Remy
--
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
