QuoVadis also does not believe a transition period is necessary for the reasons
described by Jacob.
Delaying the erratum that we all seem to accept simply adds friction to the
introduction of CAA.
Regards, Stephen
From: Public [public-boun...@cabforum.org] on
I believe a transition period is not necessary, because it's entirely
possible to operate the RFC 6844 algorithm and the RFC 6844 + erratum 5065
algorithm in tandem, without significantly impacting issuance.
The lookups done under erratum 5065 are a strict subset of those done under
RFC 6844, so
In light of recent discussions about a phase in period, GlobalSign changes
their vote to NO for Ballot 214.
From: Doug Beattie
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 7:34 AM
To: 'CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 214 -