Re: [cabfpub] CABG: Follow-up actions to the creation of the new Definitions and Glossary Working Group

Mozilla wants to participate in the new Definitions and Glossary Working Group. On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:27 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: > > Dear Members, > > I have added the approved Charter of the Definitions and Glossary > Working Group (DGWG) to the main GitHub

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

2024 7:48 μ.μ., Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > All, > > As mentioned during the Forum teleconference of April 11, 2024, here is a > draft charter for a Forum IPR Subcommittee. (This effort is separate, but > somewhat in parallel to the work of the Patent Advisory Group, which will >

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

Thanks, Dimitris. I will make edits to the proposal and get back to everyone. Ben On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:59 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 16/4/2024 7:48 μ.μ., Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > All, > > As mentioned during the

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

run the actuall ballot? > > > > > Voting shall be egalitarian: all Members shall vote together as a > single class > > Is the intent here to also allow Associated Members, Probationary Members > and Interested Parties to vote? > > Regards, > > Martijn > >

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

All, I will put this in ballot format. I am looking for endorsers. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:48 AM Ben Wilson wrote: > All, > > As mentioned during the Forum teleconference of April 11, 2024, here is a > draft charter for a Forum IPR Subcommittee. (This effort is separate, but >

[cabfpub] Draft Charter for IPR Subcommittee

All, As mentioned during the Forum teleconference of April 11, 2024, here is a draft charter for a Forum IPR Subcommittee. (This effort is separate, but somewhat in parallel to the work of the Patent Advisory Group, which will be handling GoDaddy's Patent Exclusion Notice, filed Mar. 22, 2024, in

Re: [cabfpub] Patent Advisory Group Formation

Just a reminder - If you or your IP counsel are interested in participating in the Patent Advisory Group, please let me know by close of business Friday. Thanks. Ben On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:03 AM Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > All, > In today's Forum call, I announced that we are coll

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot FORUM-021. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:03 AM Clint Wilson via Public wrote: > *Ballot FORUM-021* > > Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of > DigiCert and Tim Callan of Sectigo. > > *Purpose of Ballot* > > The CA/Browser Forum

[cabfpub] Patent Advisory Group Formation

All, In today's Forum call, I announced that we are collecting the names and email addresses of participants in the Patent Advisory Group through Friday, April 12, 2024, and then we'll get started. Thanks, Ben ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org

Re: [cabfpub] Discussion Period Begins | Ballot FORUM-021: Form Definitions and Glossary WG

Looks good to me. Ben On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:00 AM Clint Wilson via Public wrote: > *Ballot FORUM-021* > > Proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of > DigiCert and Tim Callan of Sectigo. > > *Purpose of Ballot* > > The CA/Browser Forum publishes Final Guidelines

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period begins: Ballot FORUM-020 v2 - Amend Code Signing Certificate Working Group Charter

Mozilla votes "Yes" on Ballot FORUM-020 v.2. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:02 PM Martijn Katerbarg via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > *Ballot FORUM-020 **v2 - Amend Code Signing Certificate Working Group > Charter* > > > > *Purpose of Ballot* > > This ballot proposes to amend the Code Signing

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-019 v.2 - Amend Server Certificate Working Group Charter - VOTING PERIOD

Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot FORUM-019 v.2. On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:44 AM Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > The voting period for Ballot FORUM-019 v.2 starts today. Votes must be > cast on the Forum public list in accordance with the Forum's Bylaws. > Voting will conclud

[cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-019 v.2 - Amend Server Certificate Working Group Charter - VOTING PERIOD

The voting period for Ballot FORUM-019 v.2 starts today. Votes must be cast on the Forum public list in accordance with the Forum's Bylaws. Voting will conclude at 16:00 UTC on 4 December 2023. *Ballot FORUM-019 v.2 - Amend Server Certificate Working Group Charter* *Purpose of Ballot* This

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-019 - Amend Server Certificate Working Group Charter - Discussion Period

Thanks, Tobias. I'll take a look at your suggestions and see if I can work in a few revisions, and then we can restart the discussion period. Ben On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:30 PM Tobias S. Josefowitz wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, Ben Wilson wrote: > > > *Ballot FORUM-019: Amend

Re: [cabfpub] Forum Ballot to Amend Server Certificate WG Charter

on the request of any Member that challenges the Applicant's > adherence to all of the requirements of section 3(a) or 3(b), by a Ballot > among the Members."* > > I read the rest of the proposed changes and they look good. If you are ok > with the change above, HARICA would be happy to

Re: [cabfpub] Forum Ballot to Amend Server Certificate WG Charter

All, I am looking for at least one more endorser for this ballot. Thanks, Ben On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:23 PM Ben Wilson wrote: > All, > > I am planning to introduce a Forum ballot to amend the Server Certificate > Working Group Charter. > > At a high level, here are some of the proposed

[cabfpub] Forum Ballot to Amend Server Certificate WG Charter

All, I am planning to introduce a Forum ballot to amend the Server Certificate Working Group Charter. At a high level, here are some of the proposed changes: - Section numbering added - "Root Certificate Issuer" voting category removed - Membership requirements for Certificate

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins for Ballot Forum-18 v3 - Update CA/B Forum Bylaws to version 2.5

Mozilla votes "Yes" on Ballot Forum-018 v3 On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > This message begins the voting period for ballot Forum-18 v3. > > Dimitris. > > Purpose of the Ballot > The Forum has identified and discussed a

[cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-0XX: Modify Charter of Server Certificate Working Group

Here is a draft ballot to modify the Charter of the Server Certificate Working Group. *Ballot FORUM-0XX: Modify Charter of Server Certificate Working Group* *Purpose of the Ballot* During discussions at Face-to-Face Meeting 58, it was noted that the membership criteria for Certificate

Re: [cabfpub] Final Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference - January 5, 2023

Do you want me to post these to the website? On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:08 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: > These are the approved Minutes of the Teleconference described in the > subject of this message, prepared by Andrea Holland (VikingCloud). > > *Forum Meeting:

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: FORUM-18, Allow Re-election of CWG Chairs and Vice Chairs

Mozilla votes "Yes" on Ballot Forum-18. On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 1:10 PM Tim Hollebeek via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > > > Ballot FORUM-18, Allow Re-election of CWG Chairs and Vice Chairs > > > > Proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and endorsed by Ben Wilson of > Mozilla and Wayne

Re: [cabfpub] Draft CA/Browser Forum agenda - Thursday, January 20, 2021 at 11:30 am Eastern Time

We might want to have an item and time allocated for the Network Security Committee report, which will meet tomorrow. On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 5:31 PM Dean Coclin via Public wrote: > *Here is the draft agenda for the subject call* > > *CA/Browser Forum Agenda* > > *Time* > > *Start(ET)* > >

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Period Begins: Ballot FORUM-17: Create Network Security Working Group

Mozilla vote "YES" on Ballot FORUM-17. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ben Wilson wrote: > Ballot FORUM-17, Create Network Security Working Group, is proposed by > Ben Wilson of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and David > Kluge of Google. > > The Voting Period for Ballot

[cabfpub] Voting Period Begins: Ballot FORUM-17: Create Network Security Working Group

Ballot FORUM-17, Create Network Security Working Group, is proposed by Ben Wilson of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and David Kluge of Google. The Voting Period for Ballot FORUM-17 begins today at 19:00 UTC and ends on 23-Dec-2021 at 19:00 UTC. *Overview* In January 2013 the

[cabfpub] Discussion Period Begins on Ballot FORUM-17: Create Network Security Working Group

The following ballot is proposed by Ben Wilson of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and David Kluge of Google. *Ballot Forum-17: Create Network Security Working Group* *Overview* In January 2013 the CA/Browser Forum’s “Network and Certificate System Security Requirements”

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

Hi Dimitris, Our IPR Policy is not perfect, so it doesn't have a solution for every possible scenario. It was written with a goal of balancing the interests of IP holders and the Forum membership. From the IPR Policy, "Working Groups will ordinarily not approve a Guideline if they are aware that

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

I'd like to get two endorsers for this ballot, unless people feel that there are comments/concerns that still need to be resolved. On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:28 AM Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > I am striking the following from the proposal: "If the ballot to change > the NC

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

nes because they would need to check for IPR issues. > > Thoughts about that? > > On the updated language and "enforcement" of updated NetSec Guidelines to > other Working Groups, I'm afraid it is not allowed. Chartered Working > Groups have the necessary isolation fr

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

t is not allowed. Chartered Working > Groups have the necessary isolation from the Bylaws so that one CWG doesn't > affect the work of another CWG, so I'm afraid this language is inconsistent > with the current Bylaws. > > > Dimitris. > > Nov 10, 2021 05:20:40 Ben Wilson via Public

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

ps. While each working group does have its own unique needs > and needs to have the ability to maintain their own requirements, there are > lots of other cases beyond the NCSSRs where uniformity is more important, > and now that we’re close to having all the policies in 3647 format

Re: [cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

f the > working groups. While each working group does have its own unique needs > and needs to have the ability to maintain their own requirements, there are > lots of other cases beyond the NCSSRs where uniformity is more important, > and now that we’re close to having all the policies in 364

[cabfpub] Draft Working Group Charter for Network Security WG

All, Here is a draft charter for a Network Security Working Group. Please provide your comments, and then we will finalize this work in the form of a Forum Ballot and Server Certificate WG Ballot. Thanks, Ben Overview In January 2013 the CA/Browser Forum’s “Network and Certificate System

Re: [cabfpub] Code signing and Time stamping

Just a few thoughts to move this conversation forward, and speaking as a CSCWG interested party and not to advocate any position of Mozilla, I think the answer depends on how strict or flexible the CABF wants to be as an organization when it comes to interpreting the scope of a working group

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins on Special Ballot Forum-16: Election of CA/Browser Forum Vice Chair

Mozilla votes "yes" On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:16 AM Mike Reilly (SECURITY) via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > Microsoft votes “Yes” on Special Ballot Forum-16 : ) Thanks, Mike > > > > *From:* Public *On Behalf Of *Dean Coclin > via Public > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2020 7:15 PM >

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins on Special Ballot Forum-15: Election of CA/Browser Forum Chair

Mozilla votes "Yes" on ballot Forum-15. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:47 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > > HARICA votes "yes" to ballot Forum-15. > > > On 2020-09-14 6:11 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: > > > Voting begins for

Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot Forum-14 version 2: Creation of S/MIME Certificates Working Group

Mozilla votes YES on Forum-14 version 2. On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:57 AM Doug Beattie via Public wrote: > > > GlobalSign votes Yes to ballot Forum-14 v2. > > > > Doug > > > > *From:* Public *On Behalf Of *Tim Hollebeek > via Public > *Sent:* Monday, June 8, 2020 4:52 PM > *To:* CABforum1 >

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins for ballot Forum-12 - Update CA/B Forum Bylaws

Mozilla votes "Yes" On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:30 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public < public@cabforum.org> wrote: > The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA > and endorsed by Mike Reilly of Microsoft and Tim Hollebeek of Digicert. > > *Purpose of

[cabfpub] Data Reuse under BR 3.2.2.4.3 (Phone Contact with Domain Contact)

All, Section 3.2.2.4.3 of the BRs says, "CAs SHALL NOT perform validations using this method after May 31, 2019. Completed validations using this method SHALL continue to be valid for subsequent issuance per the applicable certificate data reuse periods." If that is 825 days, then would that be

Re: [cabfpub] Cancel CA/B Forum teleconference November 14, 2019

I think it's the other way around. Thanksgiving in the U.S. is on the 28th. -Original Message- From: Public On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 12:23 AM To: public@cabforum.org Subject: [cabfpub] Cancel CA/B Forum teleconference

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL] FW: Ballot FORUM-10: Re-charter Forum Infrastructure Working Group

DigiCert votes YES on Ballot FORUM-10. From: Public mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 11:27 AM To: CA/B Forum Public List mailto:public@cabforum.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] FW: Ballot FORUM-10:

[cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group

I hereby announce that Voting Begins on the following ballot and that DigiCert affirmatively votes "Yes": Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group Purpose of Ballot It is proposed that the Forum establish a working group to adopt and maintain a

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group

I feel that I’ve followed the ballot rules, and I am assuming that this is a valid ballot with the comment period ending and voting beginning Friday, 1-March-2019 at 0100 UTC. From: Public On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 9:17 AM To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos

[cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group

Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group Purpose of Ballot It is proposed that the Forum establish a working group to adopt and maintain a policy, framework, and set of standards related to the issuance and management of code signing certificates by a

[cabfpub] Draft Charter for Code Signing Certificate Working Group

Here is a draft Code Signing Certificate WG Charter. Please provide your comments. https://docs.google.com/document/d/11mtnfCIeXJTX3EDz0wjV0-bigcjatC-kNJf0Uh6cMwk/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Ben Wilson ___ Public mailing list

[cabfpub] Draft SMIME Working Group Charter

Here is a draft SMIME WG Charter. Please provide your comments. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vEswtzzMm0_G0ujoAT5ChiajyqfRfDTydG9Nmsc-eo4/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Ben Wilson ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org

[cabfpub] Code Signing and SMIME Working Group Charter Drafting

As mentioned on today's call - please contact me off-list if you're interested in helping draft the charters for the two above-listed working groups. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org

[cabfpub] Draft Bylaws WG Charter

I've been meaning to get this out since the F2F - Ballot FORUM-__: Charter to Establish a Bylaws Working Group Purpose of Ballot As a necessary aspect of good governance, the CA/Browser Forum must maintain its Bylaws to ensure that the organization meets the needs of its Members and

[cabfpub] V.2.0 of CABF Bylaws

The current version of the Bylaws (v.2.0) are posted on the Website here - https://cabforum.org/bylaws/ The PDF and Word versions are here: https://cabforum.org/wiki/Bylaws The Github version has been updated and is available here -

[cabfpub] VOTING HAS STARTED Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions

VOTING HAS STARTED. DigiCert votes "YES" From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:35 PM To: CABFPub mailto:public@cabforum.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and

Re: [cabfpub] Forum Infrastructure Working Group: Initial Meeting and Declarations

From: Public mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org> > On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 9:00 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List mailto:public@cabforum.org> >; Jos Purvis (jopurvis) mailto:jopur...@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Fo

Re: [cabfpub] Forum Infrastructure Working Group: Initial Meeting and Declarations

Just a reminder – Jos, Ryan, Wayne, Moudrick and Dimitris have signed up so far on the wiki for the Infrastructure WG. Other takers? From: Public On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 12:00 PM To: Jos Purvis (jopurvis) ; CA/Browser Forum Public

Re: [cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot Forum-3: Election of CA/Browser Forum Chair - ELECTION RESULTS

Congratulations, Dimitris! I look forward to supporting you in your new role. From: Public On Behalf Of Wanko, Clemens via Public Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2018 11:35 AM To: public@cabforum.org Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot Forum-3: Election of CA/Browser Forum Chair - ELECTION

[cabfpub] Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions

Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions Ben Wilson of DigiCert calls the following proposed ballot to be published for discussion and comment by the CABF membership. Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and Jos Purvis of Cisco have endorsed the proposed ballot. Explanation

Re: [cabfpub] Forum Infrastructure Working Group: Initial Meeting and Declarations

Thanks, Jos. I’ve signed up and indicated on Doodle that I’m pretty much available except Thursday mornings when we have some of our other CABF calls. From: Public On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 10:31 AM To: CA/B Forum Public List Subject:

[cabfpub] CAB Forum Chair Candidate Statement

Hi. I'm Ben Wilson. Many of you know me, but for those who may not, I am DigiCert's VP of Compliance and have worked in PKI for approximately 20 years during which I have been an active participant in the work of the CA/Browser Forum (CAB Forum) and have held a variety of CABF leadership

[cabfpub] Final Minutes for Server Certificate Working Group Teleconference – 9 August 2018

Final Minutes for Server Certificate Working Group Teleconference - 9 August 2018 Attendees: 1. Roll Call. The roll call occurred on the previous Forum teleconference. 2. Read Antitrust Statement. Reading of the Antitrust Statement occurred on the previous Forum teleconference.

[cabfpub] Final Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference – 9 August 2018

Final Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference - 9 August 2018 Attendees: Arno Fiedler (D-TRUST), Atsushi Inaba (GlobalSign), Ben Wilson (DigiCert), Corey Bonnell (Trustwave),Daymion Reynolds (GoDaddy), Dean Coclin (DigiCert), Devon O'Brien (Google), Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA), Doug

[cabfpub] FW: Fond Farewell to Gerv Markham

Below I have forwarded Kathleen Wilson's message from the Mozilla Dev Security Policy list. It is with great sadness that we have learned the news of Gerv Markham's passing. I uploaded a few photos of Gerv from a few of our social events to the wiki - https://cabforum.org/wiki/Gerv As

[cabfpub] Server Certificate Working Group List

If you are interested in following the work of the Server Certificate Working Group, you can subscribe here: https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg If you subscribe, and after a while you notice that you are not receiving emails sent to

[cabfpub] Server Certificate WG Mailing List

If you have not subscribed to the Server Certificate WG Mailing List, please go here: https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg Posting privileges will be granted to members, associate members, and interested parties who have signed the IPR Agreement and formally declared their

[cabfpub] New Server Certificate Working Group

Hi All, As Kirk mentioned during the teleconference call yesterday, we are in the process of spinning up the Server Certificate Working Group and will hold our first meeting on July 12. Kirk and I will be sending out a more formal announcement of that meeting and solicitation for

Re: [cabfpub] EXTERNAL: CAB Forum Countdown to IPR Agreement deadline

Dear Carl, You were on a page (Documents) that automatically indexes web site contents. I’ve deleted the version you complained about. In any event, you should refer to the page located here https://cabforum.org/ipr-policy/ and let me know if you run into any other problems. Yours truly,

[cabfpub] CP Review Working Group's GitHub Branch -Pull Request #84

All, The Policy Review Working Group has just completed its review of the Baseline Requirements in an attempt to clarify use of the term "CA", which sometimes can be ambiguous. As you have been briefed several times, we chose the term "TSP" to refer to the legal entity that operates the CA,

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 206 - Amendment to IPR Policy & Bylaws re Working Group Formation

or replace "Browsers" with "Application Software Suppliers" (which doesn't sound very well). Dimitris. On 11/1/2018 7:21 πμ, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: As a preface to tomorrow's discussion of the proposed Bylaw revisions, here is a synopsis of some of the propos

Re: [cabfpub] No post of CABF minutes of Oct 12, 2017 Teleconference call

I’ve posted them now. https://cabforum.org/2017/10/12/2017-10-12-minutes/ Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP VP Compliance +1 801 701 9678 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of realsky(CHT) via Public Sent:

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 216: Update Discussion Period Process

DigiCert votes “Yes” on Ballot 216 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Gervase Markham via Public > wrote: [Updated endorsers, 2nd attempt. Timeline unchanged.] Ballot 216: Update Discussion Period Process Purpose of Ballot: The current voting

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 217: Sunset RFC 2527

DigiCert votes "Yes" on Ballot 217 On 7 Dec 2017, at 16:52, Ryan Sleevi via Public > wrote: Ballot 217: Sunset RFC 2527 Purpose of Ballot: The Baseline Requirements and Extended Validation Guidelines require that CA's disclosures of

Re: [cabfpub] CAA working group description

Let’s put this on the agenda for next CABF teleconference. Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP VP Compliance +1 801 701 9678 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Keating via Public Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 5:04 PM To: Phillip ;

[cabfpub] Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference – Oct. 12, 2017

Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference – Oct. 12, 2017 Attendees: Arno Fiedler (D-TRUST), Atsushi Inaba (GlobalSign), Ben Wilson (DigiCert), Christopher Kemmerer (SSL.com), Connie Enke (SwissSign), Curt Spann (Apple), Devon O’Brien (Google), Doug Beattie (GlobalSign), Frank Corday

[cabfpub] Draft Charter for Server Certificate Working Group

For everyone's review, here is a draft charter from the Governance Reform Committee. This charter would be attached to Ballot 206 (Amendment to IPR Policy & Bylaws re Working Group Formation) and would create the Server Certificate Working Group under the new structure of the Forum.

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 208 - dnQualifiers

DigiCert votes "yes" on Ballot 208 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 12:05 PM To: CABFPub <public@cabforum.org> Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 208 - dnQualifiers Ballot 208 - dnQualifiers Th

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

on 9.9 of the Baseline Requirements. From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 6:37 PM To: Moudrick M. Dadashov <mailto:m...@ssc.lt> <m...@ssc.lt>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <mailto:publ

Re: [cabfpub] BRs, EVGLs, and "latest version"

Ryan, One issue with the qualified audit, as was expressed during the face-to-face meeting, although I haven’t been able to find it, is that Microsoft apparently requires the WebTrust seal, which is based on an unqualified audit. If anyone can point me to the requirement, I’d appreciate

Re: [cabfpub] BRs, EVGLs, and "latest version"

Would all of the browsers need to adopt some type of statement to the effect that "all CAs are expected to comply with the most recent version of the Baseline Requirements and EV Guidelines? It seems you are just moving the statement/requirement from one place to another? -Original

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Missing Failed Ballots results on webpage

Ryan and Kirk, I’ve posted the three failed ballots to the CA/Browser Forum website now. https://cabforum.org/2017/02/24/ballot-185-limiting-lifetime-certificates/

[cabfpub] Ballot 190 and BR v. 1.5.2

With passage of Ballot 190, I have created a new version 1.5.2 of the Baseline Requirements, which I'll post shortly to the Forum website. However, we've noticed in creating this version 1.5.2 that Ballot 190 was drafted before passage of Ballot 204, which removed "or Delegated Third Party" from

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 190

DigiCert votes “yes” From: Public > on behalf of Kirk Hall via Public > Reply-To: Kirk Hall >, CA/Browser

[cabfpub] Ballots 210 and 212

The documents amended by Ballots 210 and 212 (the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements and the Baseline Requirements, respectively), have been updated on GitHub and are live now on the CA/Browser Forum website. I'll upload the Word versions of the files up to the wiki shortly.

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 212: Canonicalise formal name of the Baseline Requirements

DigiCert votes “yes” Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP VP Compliance +1 801 701 9678 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 9:06 AM To: CABFPub Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 212: Canonicalise

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 210 (NetSec Revisions)

ions) Entrust votes yes From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 8:30 PM To: CABFPub <public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>> Subject: cabfpub] Ballot 210: Misc. Changes to the Network and

Re: [cabfpub] Random value reuse

g> >>> Cc: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>; Jeremy Rowley >>> <jeremy.row...@digicert.com>; Rich Smith <richard.sm...@comodo.com>; >>> Peter Bowen <p...@amzn.com> >>> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Random value reuse >>> >>> I thi

Re: [cabfpub] Random value reuse

it was sent… > On 9 Aug 2017, at 1:54 pm, Ben Wilson via Public <public@cabforum.org> wrote: > > Putting the issue of "reuse" aside, do we need to clarify this issue of > which random value methods can be used in combination with others? It seems > that a rando

Re: [cabfpub] Random value reuse

Putting the issue of "reuse" aside, do we need to clarify this issue of which random value methods can be used in combination with others? It seems that a random value could be provided to the domain contact / admin under methods 2, 3 (if you wanted) or 4 and then used within 30 days for

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot 190 - Recording BR Version Number

sed on approved ballots rather than being dependent on BR version numbers 3. Doesn’t require a separate section of the BRs to be updated and kept in synch 4. Can easily be added to ballot 190 while we’re waiting for ballot 202 Thanks, Wayne On 8/1/17, 9:28 AM, "Public on behalf of B

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot 190 - Recording BR Version Number

There are two sides to this - one is with the CAs, where they record what method was used, and the other is at the CA/Browser Forum level, where someone maintains a chart, or whatever, of validation methods in effect, and historically which ones were effective during which periods.

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot 190 - Recording BR Version Number

Are we talking about what the CA records in its database for the validation method used, or are we talking about annotating the BRs with a record of when a change was made? -Original Message- From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent:

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

31, 2017 9:27 AM To: Ben Wilson <ben.wil...@digicert.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability On 25/07/17 21:59, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > Here is another pre-ballot for discussion. Can you explai

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

hink I now see your point. Not “up to” it needs to be “not less than $5 million.” Would that make it clearer? Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP VP Compliance +1 801 701 9678 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:10 PM

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 5:10 PM To: Moudrick M. Dadashov <m...@ssc.lt <mailto:m...@ssc.lt> >; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org&

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

Never mind – I think I now see your point. Not “up to” it needs to be “not less than $5 million.” Would that make it clearer? Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP VP Compliance +1 801 701 9678 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Tuesday

Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability

ilto:public@cabforum.org> <public@cabforum.org> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 209 EV Liability Hi Ben, could it be "or" between (1) and (2)? Thanks, M.D. On 7/25/2017 11:59 PM, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: Here is another pre-ballot for discussion. Ballot 209 - EV L

Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot 190 - Recording BR Version Number

Maybe someone could provide an example of how the BR version number would appear at the end of each validation method? For example, would it look like this? [BR 1.5.0] - with the implication that the method was allowed as of BR v. 1.5.0 going forward until the current version of the BRs? If

[cabfpub] CABF Plenary Teleconference Calls

All, If it's alright, and for the benefit of members located in Asia, I'm going to start posting the WebEx recordings of CAB Forum plenary meeting calls to the wiki. Access to the recording of today's call is available here: https://cabforum.org/wiki/Teleconference%20recordings Ben

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

DigiCert votes “Yes” From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:34 PM To: Peter Bowen <p...@amzn.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>; Ryan Sleevi <sle...@google.c

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

Jul 12, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Ben Wilson via Public <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org> > wrote: Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters The current Baseline Requirements do not expressly allow underscore characters in Subject Alternative Names. This ballot see

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 204: Forbid DTPs from doing Domain/IP Ownership Validation

DigiCert votes “yes” on Ballot 204. From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 8:18 AM To: CABFPub > Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 204: Forbid DTPs from doing Domain/IP

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 205: Membership-Related Clarifications

DigiCert votes “yes” From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:43 AM To: CABFPub Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 205: Membership-Related Clarifications Ballot 205: Membership-Related

Re: [cabfpub] Four sets of changes for proposed ballots

I’m helping to prepare ballots for these four sets of changes. So far, here are the anticipated endorsers: Peter B., Ryan S. and I intend to present the “underscores” ballot shortly (Ballot 202). I believe that Peter and Li Chun Chen will be presenting the ASN1 ballot, and I’m willing to

Re: [cabfpub] Updated Ballot 190 v2 dated June 29, 2017

Here is the comment tracking document. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uhKyrW9v9dDqgo4sVxoRx5e7sw0GE6zDoYqe EoE1WiI/edit?usp=sharing (If you make any changes, be sure to save a copy of

Re: [cabfpub] Voting on Ballot 192 ends tomorrow (Wed. June 28) at 22:00 UTC

Please vote so that we reach quorum From: Kirk Hall via Public Sent: ‎6/‎27/‎2017 2:54 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting on Ballot 192 ends tomorrow (Wed. June 28) at

  1   2   >