Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: SC13 version 5: CAA Contact Property and Associated E-mail Validation Methods

GoDaddy votes yes on SC13. From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 4:56 PM To: servercert...@cabforum.org; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins: SC13 version 5: CAA Contact Property and

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

GoDaddy votes YES From: Public On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:04 AM To: CABFPub Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-4 v3

GoDaddy votes yes Ballot FORUM-4 v3 Von: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] Im Auftrag von Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg Gesendet: Freitag, 14. September 2018 20:50 An: CABFPub mailto:public@cabforum.org>>; servercert...@cabforum.org

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC6 v3 - Revocation Timeline Extension

GoDaddy votes YES on Ballot SC6 v3 From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer via Public Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 11:54 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List mailto:servercert...@cabforum.org>> Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public

Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

GoDaddy votes YES to FORUM-1 From: Public On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 7:31 AM To: Bruce Morton ; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group DigiCert votes

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Voting begins: Ballot SC3 version 2

GoDaddy votes yes for SC3 v2. From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Neil Dunbar via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 10:09 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Cc: servercert...@cabforum.org Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot SC3 version 2 TrustCor

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot SC2 - version 2: Validating certificates via CAA CONTACT

GoDaddy votes YES. Daymion From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Morton via Public Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:10 AM To: Tim Hollebeek ; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List ; servercert...@cabforum.org Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot SC2 -

Re: [cabfpub] Voting ends tomorrow on Ballot 223 v2 (Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria)

Godaddy votes yes. From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 8:20 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List Subject: [cabfpub] Voting ends tomorrow on Ballot 223 v2 (Update BR Section 8.4 for CA

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

GoDaddy votes YES on Ballot 218 From: Public > on behalf of Tim Hollebeek via Public > Reply-To: Tim Hollebeek >,

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

I am in agreement with this approach. Thanks Ryan for wrapping this up. Daymion From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:49 PM To: Daymion T. Reynolds Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List ; Kirk Hall

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

Ryan, Q: Can you explain why you do not believe it is more secure? A: I am not stating its more secure, but .1 Option #3 is on par with other deemed secure options. It is secure because only the domain owner is the authorized user to a registrars account, and only they can order a cert for a

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

ssuance. This seems like it should be an uncontroversially good thing, and not presently required under .1, as previously demonstrated. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Daymion T. Reynolds via Public <public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>> wrote: Tim, I concur

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5

Tim, I concur with Kirk's statement about method 1. Method 1 should be improved, as we should leverage CA/Registrar combos whenever possible. With the objective being ownership validation, I can't think of a better method of knowing who actually owns a domain than to have the