Google votes YES on Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:12 PM Ben Wilson via Public
wrote:
> VOTING HAS STARTED.
>
>
>
> DigiCert votes “YES”
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson via Public
>
Google votes YES on Ballot SC6 v3.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:51 PM Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg <
servercert...@cabforum.org> wrote:
> Here is version 3 of this ballot, incorporating changes to v2 suggested by
> Bruce and Ryan (thanks!).
>
> I noticed that our current bylaws have reverted
Google votes NO
While supportive of efforts to offer CAs flexibility in light of ICANN
policy changes, we're concerned that the amount of time to review concrete
efforts to improve this has been limited. We do not feel confident in the
security considerations of this method, in particular, the
Google votes YES on Ballot 206.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:30 AM Wayne Thayer via Public
wrote:
> Mozilla votes YES on ballot 206.
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Virginia Fournier via Public <
> public@cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ballot 206: Amendment to IPR Policy &
Google votes YES on Ballot 220.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:40 AM Tim Hollebeek via Public <
public@cabforum.org> wrote:
>
>
> Ballot 220: Minor Cleanups (Spring 2018)
>
>
>
> Purpose of Ballot: This ballot corrects two incorrect cross-references and
> one terminology error.
>
>
>
> The following
Google votes YES on Ballot 218.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public <
public@cabforum.org> wrote:
> DigiCert votes YES on Ballot 218.
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Tim
> Hollebeek via Public
> *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2018
Hello CA/B Forum,
In order to better align Google's github repositories, we have moved the
Chromium CT Policy documentation to a new home within the /chromium repo.
All existing links to the old repository (https://github.com/
GoogleChrome/ct-policy) should now redirect to the new one (
Google votes YES on Ballot 208.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Kirk Hall via Public
wrote:
> Voting ends Thursday, Oct. 26 at 22:00 UTC
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] * On Behalf Of *Ben
> Wilson via Public
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 12, 2017
Google votes YES on Ballot 207.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Ben Wilson via Public
wrote:
> *Ballot 207 - ASN.1 Jurisdiction in EV Guidelines*
>
>
>
> This ballot clarifies the use of the ASN.1 Jurisdiction of incorporation
> field used in EV Certificates.
>
>
>
> The
Google votes YES on Ballot 215
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Kirk Hall via Public
wrote:
> Voting ends October 5 at 16:00 UTC
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] * On Behalf Of *Ben
> Wilson via Public
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 8:48
Google Chrome votes YES on Ballot 214.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Kirk Hall via Public
wrote:
> Correcting subject line to Ballot 214
>
>
>
> *From:* Kirk Hall
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 20, 2017 5:55 PM
> *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Hello CA/B Forum,
In advance of the conclusion of Ballot 214’s voting period, we’re writing
to share with the CA community Google Chrome’s stance regarding permissible
CAA algorithm usage.
We consider the CAA checking algorithm specified in Erratum 5065 to be
superior to the one specified in RFC
Google votes YES on Ballot 210
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Kirk Hall via Public
wrote:
> Entrust votes yes
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson via Public
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 12,
13 matches
Mail list logo