Let's Encrypt votes YES on Ballot FORUM-17
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:39 PM Ben Wilson via Public
wrote:
> Ballot FORUM-17, Create Network Security Working Group, is proposed by
> Ben Wilson of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and David
> Kluge of Google.
>
> The Voting Period
Internet Security Research Group (Let's Encrypt) declares its participation
in the only Chartered Working Group – the Server Certificate Working Group
(SCWG).
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 6:23 PM Kirk Hall via Public
wrote:
> As noted in my prior emails, as of the Ballot 206 effective date of July
> 3,
Let's Encrypt votes YES on ballot 218
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Berge, J. van den (Jochem) - Logius
via Public wrote:
> PKIoverheid votes YES.
>
>
>
> We’ve been following the discussion as it has unfolded. The definition of
> current methods 3.2.2.4.1 and 3.2.2.4.5,
It can be very difficult for a CA to determine who is the legal owner
of a domain, thus taking action (e.g. revoking) on that basis creates
significant liability. The BRs should not introduce additional rules
requiring such determinations.
A couple of ideas that don't depend on determining legal
ISRG / Let's Encrypt votes YES as this is a much appreciated
improvement over the current text, but in the future we would like to
see lifetimes reduced further for the sake of improved security.
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
I would still endorse at 13 months.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Andrew Ayer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:37:19 -0800
>> Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
I would be glad to endorse this ballot on behalf of ISRG / Let's Encrypt.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public
wrote:
> I'm looking for two endorsers to publicly endorse this ballot.
>
> Background:
> The validity period of certificates represents the