This is good idea, but unfortunately, hardly realizable - the fact that
a country has ISO/ITU designated RA, doesn't mean you can get an OID...
Thanks,
M.D.
On 9/4/2017 10:54 AM, Scott Rea via Public wrote:
In the use case stated here, the applicant only does not qualify because
there is not
In the use case stated here, the applicant only does not qualify because
there is not a unique ID and date registered with an accepted authority
(if I understand things correctly). So why not ask the organization to
register their company with whoever the country RA is (assuming the
country has an
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Rich Smith wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2017 1:32 PM
>
> Thanks Rich for sharing the added details about when this case comes up.
>
>
>
> Is it frequent enough to require
..@entrustdatacard.com> >; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion
List <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or
date
On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.or
be logged/tracked in an added Appendix to
> the EVGs
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Geoff
> Keating via Public
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:36 PM
> *To:*
: Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:36 PM
To: Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public
Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or
date
On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Pu
> On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
>
> Geoff – clearly this applicant will now be denied, but I have to disagree
> with one of your underlying assumptions below - “there is no way to uniquely
> identify the entity”. Rich Smith of Comodo indicated
Sleevi <sle...@google.com>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration
number or date
On 31 Aug 2017, at 1:21 pm, Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.org
<mailto:public@cabforum.org> > wrote:
There is a well-established legal doctrine of
> On 31 Aug 2017, at 8:29 am, Rich Smith via Public wrote:
>
> EVG 11.2.1 (1)(c) states:
> (C) Registration Number: Obtain the specific Registration Number assigned to
> the Applicant by the Incorporating or Registration Agency in the Applicant's
> Jurisdiction of
EVG 11.2.1 (1)(c) states:
(C) Registration Number: Obtain the specific Registration Number assigned to
the Applicant by the Incorporating or Registration Agency in the Applicant's
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration. Where the Incorporating or
Registration Agency does not assign a
10 matches
Mail list logo