Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-04 Thread Moudrick M. Dadashov via Public
This is  good idea, but unfortunately, hardly realizable - the fact that a country has ISO/ITU designated RA, doesn't mean you can get an OID... Thanks, M.D. On 9/4/2017 10:54 AM, Scott Rea via Public wrote: In the use case stated here, the applicant only does not qualify because there is not

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-04 Thread Scott Rea via Public
In the use case stated here, the applicant only does not qualify because there is not a unique ID and date registered with an accepted authority (if I understand things correctly). So why not ask the organization to register their company with whoever the country RA is (assuming the country has an

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-01 Thread Ryan Sleevi via Public
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Rich Smith wrote: > > > > > *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2017 1:32 PM > > Thanks Rich for sharing the added details about when this case comes up. > > > > Is it frequent enough to require

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Smith via Public
..@entrustdatacard.com> >; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.or

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-01 Thread Ryan Sleevi via Public
be logged/tracked in an added Appendix to > the EVGs > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Regards, > > Rich > > > > *From:* Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Geoff > Keating via Public > *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:36 PM > *To:*

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Smith via Public
: Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:36 PM To: Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Pu

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-08-31 Thread Geoff Keating via Public
> On 31 Aug 2017, at 2:42 pm, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Geoff – clearly this applicant will now be denied, but I have to disagree > with one of your underlying assumptions below - “there is no way to uniquely > identify the entity”. Rich Smith of Comodo indicated

[cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-08-31 Thread Kirk Hall via Public
Sleevi <sle...@google.com> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date On 31 Aug 2017, at 1:21 pm, Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org> > wrote: There is a well-established legal doctrine of

Re: [cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-08-31 Thread Geoff Keating via Public
> On 31 Aug 2017, at 8:29 am, Rich Smith via Public wrote: > > EVG 11.2.1 (1)(c) states: > (C) Registration Number: Obtain the specific Registration Number assigned to > the Applicant by the Incorporating or Registration Agency in the Applicant's > Jurisdiction of

[cabfpub] EV 11.2.1 Private Organization registration number or date

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Smith via Public
EVG 11.2.1 (1)(c) states: (C) Registration Number: Obtain the specific Registration Number assigned to the Applicant by the Incorporating or Registration Agency in the Applicant's Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration. Where the Incorporating or Registration Agency does not assign a