Replying in this thread to maintain the context.
I think that would be good. I'm afraid I can't quite remember why
creation ordering is better or why this proposal is better. I'm not
opposed to it but I'd like to give others a chance to check it over too.
Would you mind writing quick summary
Have we considered just using an explicit priority, with creation time (or
TFI, or some other mechanism) as a tie-breaker?
- Kris
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Shane Stephens sh...@google.com wrote:
Replying in this thread to maintain the context.
I think that would be good. I'm afraid I
Hi Shane,
I definitely agree start-time scheduling is problematic. I was just
interested in why creation-time ordering is better, particularly as
opposed to first-transition-from-idle (let's call it FTFI).
The first two points of your mail were about the problems with TFI which
I agree are
