RE: [web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations

2015-07-13 Thread David Dailey
fixing bugs associated with it become less of a priority? Regards David -Original Message- From: Brian Birtles [mailto:bbirt...@mozilla.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:03 PM To: public-fx@w3.org Cc: www-st...@w3.org; 'www-svg' Subject: Re: [web-animations] Request to publish

Re: [web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations

2015-07-13 Thread Brian Birtles
Hi David, On 2015/07/14 5:58, David Dailey wrote: I'm a bit confused (still). In looking through the document, it looks as though almost everything that looks like traditional animation (in terms of the 15 year old thing that people used to call a W3C Standard -- I finally understand W3C's use

Re: [web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations

2015-07-07 Thread Brian Birtles
On 2015/07/01 15:59, Brian Birtles wrote: On 2015/06/18 16:24, Brian Birtles wrote: Dear all, The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail.

Re: [web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations

2015-07-01 Thread Brian Birtles
On 2015/06/18 16:24, Brian Birtles wrote: Dear all, The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail. We plan to publish on July 2 unless there

[web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations

2015-06-18 Thread Brian Birtles
Dear all, The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail. We plan to publish on July 2 unless there are any objections. Best regards,