Re: [compositing] Requesting clarification of color interpolation

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de wrote: On 01/19/2015 05:28 AM, Nikos Andronikos wrote: I'm not quite following what you've written here. I think you're saying you would like the initial values of color-interpolation to be changed to linearRGB but I'm not sure how

Re: [geometry] DOMMatrixInit dictionary

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Mar 25, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: OK, thanks. The current situation is inconsistent, which seems bad for Web developers. I admit that I can see confusion here. I agree that we should keep

Re: [motion] direction and starting point of circle/ellipse

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Erik Dahlström e...@opera.com wrote: Hi, forwarding on behalf of Eric Willigers, who found some inconsistencies in how the starting point and direction works in the motion path draft compared to svg2. In the definition of the motion-path[1] property the

Re: Animating SVG attributes from Web Animations

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Bob Hopgood frahopg...@gmail.com wrote: It is unclear to me that CSS has any idea what it is letting itself in for if it decides to style or animate the d attribute of the SVG path I have a very low definition outline of Australia which is a 50,000 bytes d

Re: Animating SVG attributes from Web Animations

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Shane Stephens sh...@google.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:53 AM Amelia Bellamy-Royds amelia.bellamy.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Although the SVG WG agreed to neuter `attributeType` for SMIL animations (so that the animation always applies to a style property

Re: ClientRectList.item() usage is very low in Blink

EXPLICITLY PINGING DIRK On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ says

Re: Should filters on the root element affect the entire canvas?

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 2/10/15 10:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: 2) The canvas background, which comes from either the root element or the body. This should possibly

Re: [css-transforms-1] [css-transforms-2] Quaternion rotation when one angle is 0

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Shane Stephens sh...@google.com wrote: Hi list, When interpolating between rotations with different axis alignment, we always fall back on matrix decomposition. However, if one of the angles is 0, then the resulting behavior is that the rotation axis snaps

Re: [css-filters-2] Clarify 'backdrop-filter' in circular case

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [css-filters-2] Clarify 'backdrop-filter' in circular case

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: You execute an extra pass where you render everything upto your nearest sibling, but you ignore any opacity, filters and compositiing. Then you use

[css-filters-2] Clarify 'backdrop-filter' in circular case

In our recent Intent To Implement for backdrop-filter, Enne brought up a case that is seemingly circular: body AAA div style=opacity: .5 BBB div style=backdrop-filter: blur(5px)foo/div /div /body What does BBB look like blur filter? Is it half-opaque, as if you'd already done all

Re: [web-animations] state and 2nd animate parameter

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Hi web animators, > Two questions: > 1) I have played around with the element.animate method in Chrome, with an > image "i": > var my_animation = i.animate([ { width: "10px" }, { width: "100px" } ], > 1000); > > When

Re: [css-masking] clip-path: path()

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: > I would like the clip-path: property[1] to actually support bezier paths (as > a naive interpretation of the property name would have you expect). > > The syntax would be a path function with an SVG-style path as a string, for >

Re: [css-transforms-1] SLERP edge case behaviour

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Shane Stephens sh...@google.com wrote: Hi list, Here's how we currently define quaternion SLERPing during interpolation: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/#interpolation-of-decomposed-3d-matrix-values When quatA = [0, 1, 0, 0] and quatB = [0, -1, 0, 0],

Re: SVG image security restrictions

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > A better idea might be to provide a way to pass in resources as parameters, > including from a CSS style sheet. This might even perform better if you have > a lot of SVG images using the same resources. Sketch: >

Re: SVG image security restrictions

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> We've switched url() over to a function, so we can add arguments to it. > > Doesn't

Re: [css-transforms] 'transform-box' defaults in svg

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Erik Dahlström wrote: > Hi, > I was reviewing the 'transform-box' section in the css transforms spec, > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms/#transform-box. > > The initial value of 'transform-box' is 'border-box', which is fine. > However,

Re: [css-masking] when to interpret 'mask-image' as SVG mask vs. image?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:16 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#the-mask-image defines a > property that can use the url() function to link to either an SVG > mask element or to an image. > > I don't see where it specifies how to tell which one of

Re: [css-masking] when to interpret 'mask-image' as SVG mask vs. image?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:16 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: >> https://drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-1/#the-mask-image defines a >> property that can use the url() function to li

Re: [css3-animations] Declaring an animation to trigger when element is detached from the DOM

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Rachel Nabors wrote: > I see the need. I would argue that this would be more of an "exit-transition" > than exit-animation, though: fires once and describes how values should > change (upon application and in accordance with :detached)

Re: [filter-effects-2] Split functionality of 'filter' and 'backdrop-filter' into several properties

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dean Jackson <d...@apple.com> wrote: >> On 25 Feb 2016, at 10:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dean Jackson <d...@apple.com> wrote: >>> On 25 Feb 2016, at 8:29 AM, Robert

Re: [filter-effects-2] Split functionality of 'filter' and 'backdrop-filter' into several properties

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dean Jackson wrote: > On 25 Feb 2016, at 8:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Dean Jackson wrote: >>> Although it's not just that it is a standalone property. It would be nice

Re: [motion-1] On path syntax

After some discussion with Shane, we have a new proposal: 1. Drop fill-rule from path() and polygon(). This keeps all the shape functions as just specifying the path geometry, so they're usable everywhere without confusion. 2. In properties that need to know the shape's fill, just accompany