Re: [web-animations] Fixing getAnimations()

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your mail. On 2015/11/30 6:31, Kevin Doughty wrote: Why is there a distinction between CSS transitionProperty and CSS animationName and script based animation id? Why are these three not one and the same? All Animations have an id which is essentially Animation's name.

Re: [web-animations] Fixing getAnimations()

Why is there a distinction between CSS transitionProperty and CSS animationName and script based animation id? Why are these three not one and the same? I do want a way to access all animations vs. a single keyed accessor. Something like getAnimations() and getAnimationNamed(). But how about you

Re: [web-animations] Fixing getAnimations()

I want to add that the problem with Apple’s Core Animation view animation for AppKit is that there is no way to specify what name is used for implicit animation (CSS transition behavior). Animations get added with a name that is the same as the property being transitioned (in most cases). This

[web-animations] Fixing getAnimations()

Hi, Web Animations defines Animatable.getAnimations() (where Animatable is implemented by Element and a forthcoming PseudoElement interface) and I think we've agreed to add Document.getAnimations() as well.[1] I've found two problems with the first method which I'm going to call

Re: [web-animations] Fixing getAnimations()

I concur these are issues. I like the way your thinking is going. [image: photo] *Rachel Nabors* Web Animation Engineer w:rachelnabors.com