Hi David,
On 2015/07/14 5:58, David Dailey wrote:
I'm a bit confused (still). In looking through the document, it looks
as though almost everything that looks like "traditional" animation
(in terms of the 15 year old thing that people used to call a "W3C
Standard" -- I finally understand W3C's u
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:58 PM, David Dailey wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I'm a bit confused (still). In looking through the document, it looks as
> though
> almost everything that looks like "traditional" animation (in terms of the 15
> year old thing that people used to call a "W3C Standard" -- I fi
ic-fx@w3.org
Cc: www-st...@w3.org; 'www-svg'
Subject: Re: [web-animations] Request to publish another WD of Web Animations
On 2015/07/01 15:59, Brian Birtles wrote:
> On 2015/06/18 16:24, Brian Birtles wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The editors of the Web Animations specifi
On 2015/07/01 15:59, Brian Birtles wrote:
On 2015/06/18 16:24, Brian Birtles wrote:
Dear all,
The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish
another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather
long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail.
On 2015/06/18 16:24, Brian Birtles wrote:
Dear all,
The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish
another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather
long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail.
We plan to publish on July 2 unless there
Dear all,
The editors of the Web Animations specification would like to publish
another Working Draft based on the current Editor's Draft.[1] A (rather
long) list of changes is included at the end of this mail.
We plan to publish on July 2 unless there are any objections.
Best regards,
Brian