[GD]
As for whether you should be 'democratic', I don't see why you'd want
to be. You are a very specificly targetted group, with relatively clear
goals (so long as you don't try to diversify into general political
issues, which would be a mistake.) Just do it. Anyone who doesn't
agree with your
Paul wrote:
"If we keep the exchange of ideas going, if we can focus on achievable
stuff which we enjoy doing and which satisfies the yen we all have in
the here and now to make as much trouble as possible for the reactionary
farts who run the system, then most of us will have a sufficient pay
arate messages about that in separate subject
threads so as to keep those discussions separate from "Organising
Neither?".
Likewise for other topics mentioned such as "immigration", "GST",
"Telstra" and "globalization" (the last of which already has a
subje
Fax (61 3) 9609 2199
Mobile: 0419 356 705
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Organising Neither?
Does anyone one out there have any coherent id
Sorry, Luke--it's not possible. It's a natural law which can be phrased
thus:
"The world is full of willing people--those willing to work, and those
willing to let them work!"
Brian Jenkins
Luke asked:
|Does anyone one out there have any coherent ideas on how Neither could
|be structured
