Re: Question
Dear Mark, I couldn't find anything about Joe Bryant being the interim Prime Minister of Caledonia. However, the concept is quite brilliant. It is obviously a very effective means of drawing attention to the extreme state of corruption of our nation. Such a ploy can serve a very useful purpose. By building a farcical entity, such as the Principality of Caledonia, it must help to awaken the poor, stupid and dumb Australians to reality. It is serious farce and, because people like yours truly are trying to fight for Justice and getting stonewalled, the construction of Caledonia will probably succeed. However, well-intentioned schemes, such as CAP, One Nation, etc., can be sabotaged. This is what James Renton and his supporters must be aware of, ie: when Caledonia looks like it might be getting somewhere, the Banks (through their existing politicians and judges) will send in people to bring them down. One ploy, which the Banks use to undermine their opposition, James Renton appears to have countered. The Banks use the media to ridicule those involved. In the Principality of Caledonia, they are already laughing. It's a very clever application of theatre. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Reclaim Australia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 5 March 2001 20:47Subject: RE: Question John Did you know that Joe Bryant is the interim Prime Minister of The Principality of Caledonia, and that Caledonia is the only true authority in Australia as it has annexed all the crown land and property of Australia including the flag have a look at the web page www.principalityofcaledonia.cc Mark -Original Message-From: John Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 5 March 2001 5:58 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Question Dear Deborah, Suing individuals like bank managers for minor offences is allowed by the banks and judges huff and puff and pretend they are doing right. However, the issues I have raised (Contract Fraud and Money Creation) are major offences which will bring the banks down from their position of dominance to one of servitude. This the banks will not allow and the judges do as they are told. The Constitutional Problem is one that will not go away. While people are starting to use it, the judges again are doing what they are told and rejecting the arguments. Nobody is yet winning on those grounds - and will not - until the judges are pushed aside and juries come into their own. This is what should have been and should always be --- and there we have the battle lines drawn. It is a question of sovereignty, ie: who rules who. Are the people sovereign or slaves? The fight can only take place in the Courts because the enemy have all the guns. If the people are prevented from securing justice in the Courts, then there will be, as Henry Lawson described, "blood on the wattle" and the whole nation of Australia will be destroyed. As for the Principality of Caledonia - I would rather see the people rally to the Flag of the Union Jack and the Southern Cross. But, if the Principality of Caledonia serves the cause of Right and Justice to defeat what exists at the moment, then go for it. Joe Bryant is also doing his best with the Alternative Three campaign. His target is a strengthened Australia on the same foundations which we supposedly already have. This is a better ideal and, if given a chance, would gain better acceptance than a Lilliputian project. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 'John Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, 5 March 2001 9:46Subject: RE: Question Hello John, Its a sick world we live in John. But I believe that what goes around, comes around. Their time will come. I know of someone on the sunshine coast who won his case but he took the manager and not the bank to court. He was awarded a huge damages claim. Did you sue the bank or the bank manager John? What do you think of everyone becoming citizens of the Principality of Caledonia? It seems to be a legal loop hole everyone is using. We are in a situation where the tax department if after us and we don't have the money to pay them. What would you advise? Sorry things didn't go as they should. But what can you expect in a country ruled by corrupt
Re: Question
Dear Deborah,
Suing individuals like bank managers for minor offences is
allowed by the banks and judges huff and puff and pretend they are doing
right. However, the issues I have raised (Contract Fraud and Money
Creation) are major offences which will bring the banks down from their position
of dominance to one of servitude. This the banks will not allow and the
judges do as they are told.
The Constitutional Problem is one that will not go away.
While people are starting to use it, the judges again are doing what they
are told and rejecting the arguments. Nobody is yet winning on those
grounds - and will not - until the judges are pushed aside and juries come into
their own. This is what should have been and should always be --- and
there we have the battle lines drawn.
It is a question of sovereignty, ie: who rules who. Are
the people sovereign or slaves?
The fight can only take place in the Courts because the enemy
have all the guns.
If the people are prevented from securing justice in the
Courts, then there will be, as Henry Lawson described, "blood on the
wattle" and the whole nation of Australia will be destroyed.
As for the Principality of Caledonia - I would rather see the
people rally to the Flag of the Union Jack and the Southern Cross. But, if
the Principality of Caledonia serves the cause of Right and Justice to defeat
what exists at the moment, then go for it.
Joe Bryant is also doing his best with the
Alternative Three campaign. His target is a strengthened Australia on the
same foundations which we supposedly already have. This is a better ideal
and, if given a chance, would gain better acceptance than a Lilliputian
project.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original Message-From:
Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 'John
Wilson' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Monday, 5 March 2001 9:46Subject: RE:
Question
Hello John,
Its a sick world we live in John. But I believe
that what goes around, comes around.
Their time will come.
I know of someone on the sunshine coast who
won his case but he took the
manager and not the bank to court. He was
awarded a huge damages claim.
Did you sue the bank or the bank manager
John?
What do you think of everyone becoming citizens of
the Principality of Caledonia?
It
seems to be a legal loop hole everyone is using.
We are
in a situation where the tax department if after us and we don't have the
money to
pay them. What would you
advise?
Sorry things didn't go as they should. But what can
you expect in a country ruled by corrupt
politicians. They have sold us
out.
Take good care now,
Deb
-Original Message- From: John Wilson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 5 March 2001 7:08
amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Question
Dear Deborah,
If you are asking about November 9th 1999 , Chief
Judge at Common Law Wood conducted a trial without a jury (against my
constant protests), convicted me and sentenced me to two years
imprisonment without parole. After three months and three weeks,
the Court of Appeal (by a vote of 2 judges to 1) released me but would
not overturn the conviction. It's all on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Without the right to Trial by Jury, we have no rights,
at all, because everything (including freedom) is ultimately decided in
Court.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-Original
Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Saturday, 3 March 2001 14:22Subject:
Question
Hi, just
wondered how your court case went on Novemebr
9th?
Take
care,
Deb
Re: Question
Dear Deborah, If you are asking about November 9th 1999 , Chief Judge at Common Law Wood conducted a trial without a jury (against my constant protests), convicted me and sentenced me to two years imprisonment without parole. After three months and three weeks, the Court of Appeal (by a vote of 2 judges to 1) released me but would not overturn the conviction. It's all on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au Without the right to Trial by Jury, we have no rights, at all, because everything (including freedom) is ultimately decided in Court. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. -Original Message-From: Deborah Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Saturday, 3 March 2001 14:22Subject: Question Hi, just wondered how your court case went on Novemebr 9th? Take care, Deb
