Hi,
there isnt a single answer unfortunately.
Lets take symetric concise bound descriptions (SCBD) which basically
means from the uri you'll get triples around it recursively until you
find other URIs. (so when you find a blank node you keep on going).
This seems a pretty good way to provide
Hi Daniel,
From my own experience, there is often a very different set of results
for dereferencing a linked data URI and a DESCRIBE on that URI in a
SPARQL endpoint.
The variance depends on how the linked data is being generated. For
applications that are generating the RDF as an alternate view
On 21/05/2009 00:02, Daniel Schwabe dschw...@inf.puc-rio.br wrote:
On 20/05/2009 17:14, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Sorry, I'll try harder :-)
I understand that what you are asking is something like this.
For some sites (including rkbexplorer), when you resolve a URI, it constructs
a SPARQL query
Peter Ansell a écrit :
Hi,
If you have a dataset that is very large and highly interlinked on
particular URI's, the DESCRIBE response may be too large to reasonably
transmit to a user over the internet (and to expect a sparql endpoint
to give out in one chunk). This is assuming the typical
Hi,
Ok so even if this sounds like a good choice, its easy to see that in
practice this is not sufficient, e.g. james bond would be a URI with
no label if you fetch any of the other 2 nodes.
This is particularly important if we take into account usability.
So probably a SCBDwL (with labels
David,
In short, although semantic web architecture could be designed to permit
unrestricted semantic drift,
I think it is a better design -- better
serving the semantic web community as a whole -- to adopt an
architecture that permits the semantics of each URI to be anchored, by
use of a URI
Washington Post: May 21, 2009 Health Care Reform 2009: Group Seeks Sway Over
E-Records System:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/20/AR2009052003600.html?sub=AR
This interesting article details the
intention of the CCHIT, a certification body for IT in health care to
W. Orthuber wrote:
David,
In short, although semantic web architecture could be designed to
permit
unrestricted semantic drift,
I think it is a better design -- better
serving the semantic web community as a whole -- to adopt an
architecture that permits the semantics of each URI to be
All,
The 30+ xslt stylesheets [1]used by the our collection Sponger
Cartridges are now available for community development and enhancement
via a github [2].
Links:
1.
http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/ClickableVirtSpongerCloud
2. http://tr.im/m0PT
--
Regards,
Greetings everyone,
I recently invited participants in the upcoming e-Biosphere conference
(June 1-3, London) to join me in a collective demonstration of the
semantic web in action [1].
The short story is that we'll be integrating wildlife observations with
background biodiversity data to
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
All,
The 30+ xslt stylesheets [1]used by the our collection Sponger
Cartridges are now available for community development and enhancement
via a github [2].
Links:
1.
Kingsley,
thanks for your email, i know that an URI can be an URL or an URN. In case of an URN the exact meaning is not at once clear, the
definition is not at once accessible,
it is even possible (http://dbooth.org/2008/irsw/) that there are competing definitions. This is not good for
On 21 May 2009, at 20:03, joel sachs wrote:
I'm mainly hoping for pointers to biodiversity data in RDF
About a month ago I started an experiment in converting the IUCN Red
List to RDF. The IUCN's data licensing policies are not entirely
clear, and I've not been able to get a good answer
Dear Joel and Toby,
You may want to look at the following sites:
Convention on Biodiversity: www.cbd.intBiodiversity Information Standards;
www.tdwg.orguBio: www.ubio.org
These will provide you with all standards and projects running, including those
focusing on linking open data and semantic
14 matches
Mail list logo
