On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue with requiring people to direct requests at the URI for the
Resource X at time T is that the circular linking issue I described
previously comes into play because people need to pre-engineer their
URI's to be
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
I'm finding the path to entry in to the linked open data world rather
difficult and confusing, and only for one specific reason - ontologies;
it /feels/ like there are some kind of ontology wars going on and I can
never get a
There are lots of trade-offs when designing an ontology, e.g.
specificity vs. size of the target user community - this has e.g. been
discussed in
Hepp, Martin: Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the
Development of Relevant Ontologies, in: IEEE Internet Computing, Vol.
11, No. 1, pp.
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:40:33 -0500,
Mark Baker wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
It should be up to resource creators to determine when the nature of a
resource changes across time. A web architecture that requires every
single edit to
2009/11/24 Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu:
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:40:33 -0500,
Mark Baker wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com
wrote:
It should be up to resource creators to determine when the nature of a
resource changes across time. A web
At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:14:01 +1000,
Peter Ansell wrote:
2009/11/24 Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu:
[…]
On the other hand, there is, nothing I can see that prevents one URI
from representing another URI as it changes through time. This is
already the case with, e.g.,
On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Erik Hetzner wrote:
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:40:33 -0500,
Mark Baker wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com
wrote:
It should be up to resource creators to determine when the nature
of a
resource changes across time. A web
