We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
This was motivated by the needs of the data.gov.uk project. After some
checking we were unable to find an existing ontology that precisely met
our needs
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in prefix.cc [2] - you might want to support it by voting it up ;)
Dave Reynolds wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
This was motivated by the needs of the data.gov.uk project. After some
checking we were unable to find an existing ontology that
On 06/01/2010 10:26 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/10 08:50, Dave Reynolds wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Looks good Dave.
This is fairly close to AIISO [1], which I'm using
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:26 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:04 +0200, Christophe Guéret wrote:
On 06/01/2010 10:26 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Brilliant! I
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:37 +0100, Damian Steer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/10 08:50, Dave Reynolds wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Hi Dave
Great resource indeed. One remark, one suggestion, and one question :)
Remark : Just found out what seems to be a mistake in the N3 file.
org:role a owl:ObjectProperty, rdf:Property;
rdfs:label role@en;
rdfs:domain org:Membership;
rdfs:range foaf:Agent;
...
I guess one
Hi Bernard,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 17:03 +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Hi Dave
Great resource indeed. One remark, one suggestion, and one question :)
Remark : Just found out what seems to be a mistake in the N3 file.
org:role a owl:ObjectProperty, rdf:Property;
rdfs:label role@en;
Hi Angelo,
On 31 May 2010, at 10:32, Angelo Veltens wrote:
DBpedia has copied the approach from D2R Server. The person who
came up with it and designed and implemented it for D2R Server is
me. This was back in 2006, before the term Linked Data was even
coined, so I didn't exactly have a
Dave Reynolds schrieb:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Great! This comes in due time :-) I was just looking for something like
that. I'll take a deeper look at it.
Kind regards,
Angelo
Hi,
- serve html at http://www.example.org/doc/alice.html always
- serve rdf/xml at http://www.example.org/doc/alice.rdf always
Right?
Correct!
I want to throw in another question, are there currently arguments for or
against the two alternatives:
http://www.example.org/doc/alice.html
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in prefix.cc [2] - you might want to
===
Call for Papers
TAAI 2010
Conference on Technologies and Applications of
Artificial Intelligence
Hsinchu, Taiwan,
All,
You may have picked this up from my tweets earlier today.
We can now produce Atom (using OData's Atom+Feed dialect) based
Descriptor Documents for Entities in DBpedia, LOD Cloud Cache, and any
other Virtuoso based RDF store.
Implications:
Ultimately (once we iron some issues with
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to post to
Twitter, and this post becomes a post in my wall in Facebook. It would
be nice to represent the relation between these two posts.
I don't think
Daniel Schwabe wrote:
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to post to
Twitter, and this post becomes a post in my wall in Facebook. It would
be nice to represent the relation between these two
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Daniel Schwabe wrote:
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to post to
Twitter, and this post becomes a post in my wall in
On 2010/06/02, at 7:20, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to post
to Twitter, and this post becomes a post in my wall in Facebook. It
would be nice to represent
On Jun 1, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Daniel Schwabe wrote:
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to
post to
On 02/06/10 00:17 - 02/06/10, KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/06/02, at 7:20, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
Hi all,
is there a preferred way to represent the relation between posts in
different Social Sites? For example, it is now pretty common to post
to Twitter, and this post becomes a post
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
This was motivated by the needs of the data.gov.uk project. After some
Good point!
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2010, at 15:06, Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of
organizational structures
Or, in the U.S. we could just partition a new web with top level domains reflective of the agencies and departments financed by our tax dollars. Open Gov!Michael A. NortonFrom: Chris Beer ch...@e-beer.net.auTo: Stuart A. Yeates
syea...@gmail.comCc: Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com;
Cool! Let me know when that's ready. End of the week ok? ;P lol
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2010, at 15:47, Mike Norton xsideofparad...@yahoo.com wrote:
Or, in the U.S. we could just partition a new web with top level
domains reflective of the agencies and departments financed by our
tax
Get Kurzweil to do it!
Michael A. Norton
From: Chris Beer ch...@e-beer.net.au
To: Mike Norton xsideofparad...@yahoo.com
Cc: Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com; Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com; Linked Data community public-lod@w3.org;
27 matches
Mail list logo
