On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:52 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
As the conversation about HTTP responses evolves, I am inclined to
believe that most still believe that:
1. URL is equivalent to a URI
2. URI is a fancier term for URI
3. URI is equivalent to URL.
I think my opinion on
Dave,
Thanks!
I was working on a much longer and convoluted response.
Best to refer to the canonical source and let it go.
Patrick
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:22 +, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:52 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
As the conversation about HTTP
Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
So
Yes Sig.ma heavily checks for properties that are subclass of label
and uses them.
I think sparallax as well.
Gio
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf
Hi there,
I have used skos:Concept for the synonym sets now and skos-xl:Label for
the terms. I linked one of the terms as prefLabel to a synset and its
synonyms as altLabel
But you can try it yourself - its online!
Example query: http://thesaurus.datenwissen.de/offen#term
Do not forget to
Hi Dan
For the record what happened to geonames ontology re. this issue
Answering to the first publication of geonames ontology in october 2006, Tim
Berners-Lee himself asked for the geonames:name attribute to be declared
as a subproperty of rdfs:label to make Tabulator able to use it. And in
Hi Kingsley,
[...]
If I want an RDF/XML representation of the document, I can ask for
Accept: application/rdf+xml
and Wikipedia would (ideally) return an RDF/XML representation of that
resource which tells me that John Lennon is a person who was born at
... murdered at ... was part
On 11/12/10 4:22 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:52 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
As the conversation about HTTP responses evolves, I am inclined to
believe that most still believe that:
1. URL is equivalent to a URI
2. URI is a fancier term for URI
3. URI is equivalent
Hi David,
Congratulations on getting the 2.0 release out. I'm looking forward to
working with it some more.
Kingsley asked about extensions. You've already mentioned the work
done at DERI, and I've previously pointed at the reconciliation API I
built over the Talis Platform [1].
I used Refines'
On 11/12/10 5:59 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Dave,
Thanks!
I was working on a much longer and convoluted response.
Best to refer to the canonical source and let it go.
Patrick
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:22 +, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:52 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 7:22 AM, Lars Heuer wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
[...]
If I want an RDF/XML representation of the document, I can ask for
Accept: application/rdf+xml
and Wikipedia would (ideally) return an RDF/XML representation of that
resource which tells me that John Lennon is a person who was
On 11/12/10 7:34 AM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi David,
Congratulations on getting the 2.0 release out. I'm looking forward to
working with it some more.
Kingsley asked about extensions. You've already mentioned the work
done at DERI, and I've previously pointed at the reconciliation API I
built
Hi Kingsley:
I recommend you take some time to work with Refine, watch the demos,
and perhaps read the paper that Richard et al published on how they
have used and extended Refine (or Gridworks as it was)
But to answer you question:
On 12 November 2010 13:23, Kingsley Idehen
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:40:14AM -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Semantic ambiguity isn't going to go away. It is part and parcel of the
very act of communication.
[...]
Witness the lack of uniform semantics in the linked data community over
something as common as sameAs. As the linked
On 11/12/10 9:18 AM, Lars Heuer wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
[...]
identity problem. Unless we'd introduce a concept to distinguish
between NIRs and IRs (like Topic Maps does with Subject Identifiers
and Subject Locators).
Topic Maps isn't doing anything that isn't being done via Linked Data
Kingsley,
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:12 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 8:40 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 07:58 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 5:59 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
snip
Patrick / Dave,
I am hoping as the responses
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:08:36 +0100
Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
DL is a tiresome bore. Add a few more
Dear Dan,
On 2010/11/12, at 20:08, Dan Brickley wrote:
Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
FWIW, the footer on the page of the tool mentioned
[[
© University of Manchester, 2003, © University of
Unfortunately, they should complain. OWL defines rdfs:label as an
annotation property, but foaf:name is a datatype property.
If foaf decided to make foaf:name an annotation property too, then it
would be possible to assert that, and even to retain the domain and
range assertions.
While they
On 11/12/10 1:31 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:12 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 8:40 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 07:58 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 5:59 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
snip
Patrick /
Dear all,
On behalf of AKSW Research Group [1] I'm pleased to announce the first
public release of the *LIMES framework* (Link Discovery Framework for
Metric Spaces) available for download at:
http://limes.sf.net
LIMES implements time-efficient and lossless approaches for large-scale
link
(Sorry I haven't played with Google Refine 2.0, but I would like to
make some comments)
I'm pretty sure we're on the same page regarding the big vision:
make data more fun, more useful, and easier to deal with. My focus
is on a smaller and more immediate problem: how to let people handle
Kingsley,
Last one for today!
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 16:05 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 1:31 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
snip
Not to be offensive but are you familiar with begging the question?
You are assuming that ...we can solve ambiguity in the context of
Linked Data
On 11/12/10 6:47 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
Last one for today!
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 16:05 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/12/10 1:31 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
snip
Not to be offensive but are you familiar with begging the question?
You are assuming that ...we can solve
25 matches
Mail list logo
