Very interesting stuff, but...
Sorry Bernard, I agree very much with Chris here.
The name meant little to me as Vocabularies of a Friend.
In fact I think it misled me - I immediately assumed it was to do with
representing information about people (as FOAF), and it took me quite a while
to
On 1/25/11 8:01 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Very interesting stuff, but...
Sorry Bernard, I agree very much with Chris here.
The name meant little to me as Vocabularies of a Friend.
Hmm. Is it the Name or Description that's important?
In fact I think it misled me - I immediately assumed it was
* [2011-01-25 11:21:45 -0500] Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com écrit:
] Hmm. Is it the Name or Description that's important?
]
] But what about discerning meaning from the VOAF graph?
Humans looking at documents and trying to understand a system
do so in a very different way from
On 1/25/11 11:59 AM, William Waites wrote:
* [2011-01-25 11:21:45 -0500] Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com écrit:
] Hmm. Is it the Name or Description that's important?
]
] But what about discerning meaning from the VOAF graph?
Humans looking at documents and trying to understand a system
Sorry Kingsley, I think you've just demonstrated a very risky
assumption. People will just mishear and mis-read and get confused.
Most web programmers look for a good-enough example to copy, not read
the docs.
On 25/01/11 17:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 1/25/11 11:59 AM, William Waites
On 1/25/11 12:24 PM, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
Sorry Kingsley, I think you've just demonstrated a very risky
assumption. People will just mishear and mis-read and get confused.
Most web programmers look for a good-enough example to copy, not read
the docs.
But you're assuming my
Hello all
Points taken. Somehow changed the headings and itroduction at
http://www.mondeca.com/foaf/voaf-doc.html
to make more explicit what is is about (hopefully).
I did not change (yet) either VOAF acronym or namespace. To tell the truth,
my first idea was LOV for Linked Open Vocabularies,
