Hello Dieter!
Once I asked a similar question here, maybe the answers can help you as well
[1]
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Oct/0305.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Oct/0305.htmlYury
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Dieter Fensel
Hello everybody,
Am 14.03.2011 09:28, schrieb Martin Hepp:
Hi Dieter:
There are several ontology repositories available on-line, but to my knowledge
they all suffer from two serious limitations:
1. They do not rate ontologies by quality/relevance/popularity, so you do not
get any hint
At 00:04 14.03.2011, Bob Ferris wrote:
Hello again,
an issue that is strongly related to the raised concern is ontology marketing:
Yes, we all can learn from Martin on this.
--
Dieter Fensel
Director STI Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Austria
http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
phone:
On 14 Mar 2011, at 09:15, Bob Ferris wrote:
2. The selection of ontologies listed is, to say the best, often biased or
partly a random choice. I do not know any repository that
- lists more non-toy ontologies than abandoned PhD project prototypes.
I don't want to take a concrete position
Am 14.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
On 14 Mar 2011, at 09:15, Bob Ferris wrote:
2. The selection of ontologies listed is, to say the best, often biased or
partly a random choice. I do not know any repository that
- lists more non-toy ontologies than abandoned PhD project prototypes.
Hi all,
These are the tools that I personally use when publishing Linked Data, both
for ontologies reusing [1] and concepts identification [2]
In my honest opinion are the best tools I could find for those purposes
Best Regards
[1] http://ws.nju.edu.cn/falcons/ontologysearch/index.jsp?query=
Apologies if you receive multiple copies.
Please consider to contribute and/or forward to interested colleagues
and groups.
Call for Papers
2nd Workshop on Personal Semantic Data: PSD 2011
http://semanticweb.org/wiki/PSD2011
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Martin Hepp
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Hi Dieter:
There are several ontology repositories available on-line, but to my
knowledge they all suffer from two serious limitations:
1. They do not rate ontologies by quality/relevance/popularity, so you
Keith,
Could you please add a few words about SchemaCache on this wiki page:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Ontology_Dowsing#Repositories
Thanks and regards,
AZ.
Le 14/03/2011 14:18, Keith Alexander a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Martin Hepp
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Hi
I really like:
http://www.bioontology.org/bioportal
. Are there any RDF
dumps or a SPARQL endpoint? If I have a URL for either I can get this
data into our LOD cloud cache instance which will also help with
discoverability etc..
We have a prototype SPARQL end point at
On 3/14/11 11:08 AM, Natasha Noy wrote:
We have a prototype SPARQL end point athttp://sparql.bioontology.org/
It gives you access to most ontologies in BioPortal.
Natasha,
Would you have a sample SPARQL query for getting at the ontology data?
I tried:
select distinct ?y where {?y a ?x} limit
On 3/14/11 11:08 AM, Natasha Noy wrote:
We have a prototype SPARQL end point athttp://sparql.bioontology.org/
It gives you access to most ontologies in BioPortal.
Details on the RDF that we generate and other related information is at:
http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/RDF_in_BioPortal
--
Apologies for Cross-posting
=
DC-2011 Call for Papers
=
International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications:
Metadata Harmonization: Bridging Languages of
On 3/14/11 12:41 PM, David Shotton wrote:
Our Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies (SPAR;
http://purl.org/spar/) may be of tangential relevance.
Do you have URLs for these ontologies where data format is one of:
RDF/XML, N-Triples, Turtle, N3 etc?
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
The latest versions of some of them are:
- CiTO:
http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/CiTO/2011-02-24-cito-2_0.owl
- FaBiO: http://sempublishing.sourceforge.net/fabio/rdf
I believe the authors will make these links available from the documentation
pages very soon:
- CiTO:
On 3/14/11 2:10 PM, Paolo Ciccarese wrote:
The latest versions of some of them are:
- CiTO:
http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/CiTO/2011-02-24-cito-2_0.owl
See:
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fspar%2Fcito%2Fcites
- FaBiO:
Bob,
On 14 Mar 2011, at 10:47, Bob Ferris wrote:
Am 14.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
The abandoned PhD project type of ontology or vocabulary has no community
around it. Therefore, one gains very little by re-using it.
...
I can only repeat myself: PhD-project-born ontologies have
Dear Paolo and Kingsley,
I believe the authors will make these links available from the documentation
pages very soon:
- CiTO:
http://speroni.web.cs.unibo.it/cgi-bin/lode/req.py?req=http:/purl.org/spar/cito
- FaBiO:
18 matches
Mail list logo
