Take2: 15 Ways to Think About Data Quality (Just for a Start)

2011-04-15 Thread Kingsley Idehen
All, Here is a new thread re. topic above. I believe this matter is interesting to many, so I've basically taken the original post (modulo 1st sentence in the original) and also appended comments from Dave Reynolds which he contributed as an extension of Glenn's original list. In addition,

Re: How many instances of foaf:Person are there in the LOD Cloud?

2011-04-15 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 4/15/11 6:32 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: re On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 05:17:10PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: opera.com 247281 ecademy.com 224875 [...] How a publicly shared Google spreadsheet doc? From there to Linked Data is a short journey :-) Not a spreadsheet but HTML

Re: Take2: 15 Ways to Think About Data Quality (Just for a Start)

2011-04-15 Thread glenn mcdonald
This reminds me to come back to the point about what I initially called Directionality, and Dave improved to Modeling Consistency. Dave is right, I think, that in terms of data quality, it is consistency that matters, not directionality. That is, as long as we know that a president was involved

Re: How many instances of foaf:Person are there in the LOD Cloud?

2011-04-15 Thread Michael Brunnbauer
re On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: http://www.foaf-search.net/TopDomains Any chance of a CSV dump too? You can expose the CSV dump URL via link/ in head/ of the HTML doc :-) I don't think there are many people who actually need those numbers as CSV but I

Re: How many instances of foaf:Person are there in the LOD Cloud?

2011-04-15 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 4/15/11 9:49 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: re On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: http://www.foaf-search.net/TopDomains Any chance of a CSV dump too? You can expose the CSV dump URL via link/ inhead/ of the HTML doc :-) I don't think there are many people

Re: Take2: 15 Ways to Think About Data Quality (Just for a Start)

2011-04-15 Thread Bob Ferris
Hi Glenn, thanks a lot for your insightful thoughts. I think, I can fully agree to them. This topic reminds me a bit of a question I stated some time ago on SemanticOverflow (now answers.semanticweb.com): When should I use explicit/anonymous defined inverse properties? [1] (btw, this

Re: Discussion meta-comment

2011-04-15 Thread Hugh Glaser
On 15 Apr 2011, at 01:02, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 4/14/11 6:42 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote: On 14 Apr 2011, at 21:35, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 4/14/11 4:11 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote: On 14 Apr 2011, at 20:11, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 4/14/11 2:55 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote: On 14 Apr 2011, at

Minting URIs: how to deal with unknown data structures

2011-04-15 Thread Frans Knibbe
Hello, Some newbie questions here... I have recently come in contact with the concept of Linked Data and I have become enthusiastic. I would like to promote the idea within my company (we specialize is geographical data) and within my country. I have read the excellent Linked Data book

Re: Minting URIs: how to deal with unknown data structures

2011-04-15 Thread Michael Hausenblas
Frans, Great to hear that you're interested in applying Linked Data and to promote it in the Netherlands - certainly a very active area ;) I would welcome any advice on this topic from people who have had some more experience with publishing Linked Data. I find [1] a very useful page