On 18/08/11 00:03, Danny Ayers wrote:
Which aggregate functions are needed?
ARQ has some support (very possibly more than) listed here:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/group-by.html
[Andy, are there any more query examples around? I can't seem to get
count(*) working here]
ARQ runs in
On 8/17/11 9:30 PM, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2011-08-17, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
Google just bought Motorola Mobility and Microsoft is rumored to buy
Nokia. The killer apps for the semantic web will be apps for mobile
devices.
But once again, is that because you cheer for SemWeb,
On 8/17/11 10:20 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
As for the mobile space, absolutely!
I personally don't think the mobile space is any more or less
interesting in the SemWeb debacle at all, or gives any special weight
to it.
Here's why I give it special weight:
1. Form factor of phones and
Increadably interesting exchange.
4) We're about semantics, so why do we not preferentially target the
problem areas where semantics are and have been a problem in the
past? One simple problem I've bumped into in my daily database work
is that it's amazingly difficult and
On 8/18/11 9:44 AM, adasal wrote:
Increadably interesting exchange.
4) We're about semantics, so why do we not preferentially target the
problem areas where semantics are and have been a problem in the
past? One simple problem I've bumped into in my daily database work
Thanks.
Yes this is the way that solutions might be developed.
Finding the parameters for how it might be done, the proper constraints on
what is ultimately behaviour, will be another matter.
Best,
Adam
On 18 August 2011 15:05, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
**
On 8/18/11 9:44
Kingsley,
Your characterization of problems is spot on:
On 8/18/2011 9:01 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
snip
Linked Data addresses many real world problems. The trouble is that
problems are subjective. If you have experienced a problem it doesn't
exist. If you don't understand a problem it
Sampo:
I disagree that no such applications exist. Below is our standard
collateral, which if you read it, will show just such a commercial
application.
As a demo corpus, we use Wikipedia, which to the Correlation Technology
Platform (and a user posing an N-Dimensional Query) is not 3.5
On 8/18/11 10:25 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
Your characterization of problems is spot on:
On 8/18/2011 9:01 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
snip
Linked Data addresses many real world problems. The trouble is that
problems are subjective. If you have experienced a problem it doesn't
If you want a multi-million business based entirely on SemWeb Technology, try
http://www.garlik.com/
(Nothing to do with me, by the way.)
I agree with others that looking for the Killer App is strange.
It's the Killer Edge (business-wise), and possibly the Killer Business that
matter.
I know
Kingsley,
From below:
This critical value only materializes via appropriate context
lenses. For decision makers it is always via opportunity costs. If
someone else is eating you lunch by disrupting your market you simply
have to respond. Thus, on this side of the fence its better to focus
On 8/18/11 1:40 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
From below:
This critical value only materializes via appropriate context
lenses. For decision makers it is always via opportunity costs. If
someone else is eating you lunch by disrupting your market you simply
have to respond. Thus, on
Kingsley,
Here are some hard numbers on integration of data benefits:
Future Integration Needs: Emerging Complex Data -
http://www.informatica.com/news_events/press_releases/Pages/08182011_aberdeen_b2b.aspx
*/Integration costs are rising/* -- As integration of external data
rises, it
On 8/18/11 2:03 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
Here are some hard numbers on integration of data benefits:
Future Integration Needs: Emerging Complex Data -
http://www.informatica.com/news_events/press_releases/Pages/08182011_aberdeen_b2b.aspx
*/Integration costs are rising/* -- As
Kingsley,
On 8/18/2011 1:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 8/18/11 1:40 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
From below:
This critical value only materializes via appropriate context
lenses. For decision makers it is always via opportunity costs. If
someone else is eating you lunch by
Kingsley,
On 8/18/2011 2:25 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 8/18/11 2:03 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Kingsley,
Here are some hard numbers on integration of data benefits:
Future Integration Needs: Emerging Complex Data -
Just an example from practise:
http://blog.seevl.net/2011/08/18/about-json-ld-and-content-negotiation/
near the end of this blog post:
... Then, we save costs. - that's it! ;)
Cheers,
Bo
Kingsley,
Citing your own bookmark file hardly qualifies as market numbers. People
promoting technologies make up all sorts of numbers about what use of X
will save. Reminds me of the music or software theft numbers. They have
no relationship to any reality that I share.
It's been enjoyable
Call for Participation
ISWC 2011 - 10th International Semantic Web Conference
October 23-27, 2011
Bonn Germany
EARLY REGISTRATION DEADLINE: September 10
http://iswc2011.semanticweb.org/attending/registration/
19 matches
Mail list logo
