3rd International Workshop on Future Television:
Making Television Integrated and Interactive
(FutureTV 2012)
http://www.linkedtv.eu/event/FutureTV2012/
Full day workshop at the 10th European Interactive TV conference
(EuroITV 2012), Berlin, Germany, on July 4th, 2012
*Important Dates*
Paper
Hi Bernard, Gerard, (and now Lars),
Thanks for the pointers. It seems like we are better off pointing
directly to lexvo if we want URIs that will
1) enable us to precisely and unambiguously refer to any official
language (including, for example, Cantonese)
2) provide the name of the language in
** C A L L F O R P A P E R S
SIMI2012
Semantic Interoperability in Medical Informatics
May 27, 2012 in Heraklion (Crete), Greece
http://grid.ece.ntua.gr/sites/simi2012/
Held in conjunction with ESWC 2012
http://2012.eswc-conferences.org/
-
FOCUS
-
Hi Sebastian,
I think I gave you wrong information in my previous email.
I just checked the 300 status code again, it says that
The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of representations.
The implicit meaning of this status code is that the request resource is an
information
Hi all
I wanted to answer Gerard yesterday but some parts of the answer have
already been addressed by Lars Marius, whom I'm happy to read here, and
even happier to see we agree, given taht in the past we sometimes agreed to
disagree on those tricky issues of identification and URIs (... and no
Useful sites for linguistics which deal with all general and specific issues of
the use of IT in human languages:
www.clarin.eu, www.linguistlist.org and www.sil.org.
You may also want to think about open archive and repository library standards
for representing human language descriptors.
Hi Bernard,
* Bernard Vatant
I think now we should forget about URIs published by pionneer projects such
as OASIS TC, lingvoj.org and lexvo.org, and stick to URIs published by
genuine authority Library of Congress which is as close to the primary source
as can be. So if you want to use a
For English and Spanish, the ISO codes should work well. Depending on the
level of granularity you require for Arabic, the codes provided might not
be enough.
Next week, we well release Glottolog/Langdoc[1], which will provide
information about 104k 'languoids' (languages, dialects,
If only they could do ISO 3166 countries as well...
==
I imagine if I lived on Bouvet I'd think so too. It gets second billing :o)
I used the URN LEX identifiers for ISO 3166. This syntax is extensible to
national regions. Like Norway and Bouvet, the US has
6th Int'l Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMO)
Graz, Austria, July 24, 2012
held in conjunction with FOIS 2012
--- First Call for Papers ---
(Sorry if there is a paper/discussion on this that I have missed somewhere. And
I may have some of this wrong, as I have essentially not used PURLs.)
M Scott Marshall and others' comments have prompted me to put pen to paper and
ask what the list thinks on this.
It has long puzzled me why
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:48 +, Hugh Glaser wrote:
[ . . . ]
What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to
go to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo?
I have (a), (b) and (c) as before.
Now if dbpedia.org goes Phut!, we are in exactly the same situation -
(b) gets
Hugh,
I commonly use PURLs when I'm modeling RDF vocabularies as described
here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#purls
This allows me to prototype the vocabulary on my workstation without
concern for where it ultimately ends up. Any instance data I generate
along the way will remain
On 17 Feb 2012, at 19:18, David Booth wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:48 +, Hugh Glaser wrote:
[ . . . ]
What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to
go to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo?
I have (a), (b) and (c) as before.
Now if dbpedia.org goes Phut!, we
Hi Jeff,
On 17 Feb 2012, at 19:24, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
Hugh,
I commonly use PURLs when I'm modeling RDF vocabularies as described
here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#purls
(Yes, I was avoiding commenting on the 302 problem. :-) )
This allows me to prototype the vocabulary on
Hi Hugh,
I can only speak for one case, some PURLs I have maintained for the last 5
years - the Personally Identifiable Information Namespace
http://purl.org/pii/terms/#
There are 16 terms. The use for the terms is in discovery, as a penultimate
node to rdf:nil in Lists and Collections.
On 2/17/12 1:48 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
(Sorry if there is a paper/discussion on this that I have missed somewhere. And
I may have some of this wrong, as I have essentially not used PURLs.)
M Scott Marshall and others' comments have prompted me to put pen to paper and
ask what the list thinks
On 2/17/12 2:18 PM, David Booth wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:48 +, Hugh Glaser wrote:
[ . . . ]
What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to
go to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo?
I have (a), (b) and (c) as before.
Now if dbpedia.org goes Phut!, we are in
Hi all,
I am writing a paper and I would like to define the meaning of the
Dereferencing URI on the Web.
When resolve a URI on the traditional Web, we retrieve a document
representation of the resource with status code 200OK, means we resolve the
URI successfully. On the Semantic Web, when
On 2/17/12 5:37 PM, Yang Squared wrote:
Hi all,
I am writing a paper and I would like to define the meaning of the
Dereferencing URI on the Web.
When resolve a URI on the traditional Web, we retrieve a document
representation of the resource with status code 200OK, means we
resolve the URI
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 17 Feb 2012, at 19:18, David Booth wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:48 +, Hugh Glaser wrote:
[ . . . ]
What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to
go to
On Friday 17. February 2012 02.19.15 Yang Squared wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Web architecture question here.
Assume I have a information resource URI http://example.com/homepage.html
I would like to publish a RDF metadata
(http://example.com/data/homepagerdf) about
this information
Many thanks Scott.
I hope you realised that I didn't want to imply you were describing any
particular scenario with respect to PURL - it was more your comments sparked
something off for me.
And thank you for your late-night efforts to describe the SharedNames scenario!
It is very helpful; I had
Hi Hugh,
There are several aspects to PURLs that I think are relevant to LOD. Some of
them are:
- PURLs allow a general Web user to curate the location of a persistent
identifier without needing administrative access to a DNS server, an Apache
server or other non-user-oriented technology.
Hi Bernard, Scott, others,
Bernard Vatant wrote:
For the first point I guess if LoC is not able to ensure stable URIs
inside its DNS, who will? And both from a social (trust) point of view
and technical one, I prefer to have URIs in the id.loc.gov
http://id.loc.gov namespace than in some more
25 matches
Mail list logo
