2013/1/4 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
2013 is the year to get serious about linked data!
+100!
Let 2013 be indeed the year of serious gardening of the Data (and
Vocabularies) Commons
Reminder :
http://blog.hubjects.com/2012/03/lov-stories-part-2-gardeners-and.html
--
*Bernard
Hi,
David, Bernard, Kingsley,
Thank you for your answers.
Bernard you're right, I fell into the trap. No way to define a canonic prop
with the intended semantics and make it a subProp of owl:sameAs because if you
state
s :canonic canonicRes .
you can infer
canonicRes :canonic s .
Regarding
One might just simply stay silent and move along, but i take a few
seconds to restate the obvious.
It is a fact that Linked data as publish some stuff and they will
come, both new publishers and consumers has failed.
The idea of putting some extra energy would simply be useless per se
BUT it
On 5 January 2013 00:14, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 1/4/13 4:02 PM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
One might just simply stay silent and move along, but i take a few
seconds to restate the obvious.
It is a fact that Linked data as publish some stuff and they will
come,
It is an economy to me because it involves informational flows and
financial flows. These might be thought as goods and services, or just
packets of data.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Brent Shambaugh
brent.shamba...@gmail.comwrote:
Oops, the last link is an abstract describing the
