EU project networking session @ ESWC2013 May 28, 2013. Montpellier, France.

2013-03-12 Thread Fabien Gandon
EU PROJECT NETWORKING SESSION @ ESWC2013. May 28, 2013. Montpellier, France. http://2013.eswc-conferences.org/program/eu-project-networking CALL FOR EU PROJECT NETWORKING The EU project networking track of the ESWC2013 will provide an opportunity for * Knowledge sharing among EU projects *

5th AI Mashup Challenge at ESWC2013

2013-03-12 Thread Fabien Gandon
== 5th AI Mashup Challenge at ESWC 2013 == Second Call for Papers The AI mashup challenge accepts and awards mashups that use semantic web technology, including but not restricted to machine learning and data mining, machine vision, natural language

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread John Erickson
Regarding the specific question of the orcid.org proxy returning correct http conneg results --- a must in order to be linked data savvy --- a couple years ago a similar observation was made of crossref.org and they remedied the situation nicely. Since a few of the people involved in ORCID

Linking to non-RDF datasets

2013-03-12 Thread Alasdair J G Gray
Hi All, We are making extensive use of the VoID vocabulary [1] in the Open PHACTS project [2] to describe our datasets. We are currently deciding how to model a recurring use case of needing to describe non-RDF datasets and manage linksets to them. In the VoID vocabulary, a dataset is

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Dawson, Laura
Stian, whatever you discover, I'd be interested to know - ORCID numbers are a subset of ISNI, and I'm on the ISNI board of directors. We'd want to work in parallel. On 3/12/13 8:06 AM, John Erickson olyerick...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding the specific question of the orcid.org proxy returning

Re: Linking to non-RDF datasets

2013-03-12 Thread Bernard Vatant
Hi Alasdair Some results from http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/search/#s=dataset http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Dataset is quite generic, but does not have any attached properties. http://purl.org/ctic/dcat#Dataset is a subclass of the above, is intended to represent datasets in a catalogue, and is

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Hugh Glaser
Yes. I went to ORCID to see if I could do the linkage to other URIs (and sameAs.org it) but found it wasn't Linked Data so I went away again. It would be nice to think this was a bug, rather than a feature, and that it could be Linked Data. On 12 Mar 2013, at 11:21, Stian Soiland-Reyes

Re: Linking to non-RDF datasets

2013-03-12 Thread Alasdair J G Gray
Hi Bernard, On 12 Mar 2013, at 13:40, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote: Hi Alasdair Some results from http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/search/#s=dataset http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Dataset is quite generic, but does not have any attached properties.

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.uk wrote: moment [5] - I would be careful about using foaf:account to the ORCID URI, as the ORCID identifies the person (at least in a scientific context), and not an OnlineAccount - has someone else tried a

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Jonathan A Rees
Remember it took a while for DOIs to become linked-data-friendly. I suspect ORCID has limited staff that is swamped with work and LD is not a priority for them. I say give them a year or two to get up to speed and in the meantime continue to submit bug reports. It's not clear to me whether they

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Dawson, Laura
As I mentioned, ORCID is a subset of ISNI (functionally). ISNI identifies public entities - the name of the person. So, just to use a pop-culture analogy, Lady Gaga and Stefani Germanotta would have two different ISNIs (one is the performer, the other is the composer, according to liner notes).

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 10:57 AM, Jonathan A Rees wrote: Remember it took a while for DOIs to become linked-data-friendly. I suspect ORCID has limited staff that is swamped with work and LD is not a priority for them. I say give them a year or two to get up to speed and in the meantime continue to submit

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 11:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 3/12/13 10:57 AM, Jonathan A Rees wrote: Remember it took a while for DOIs to become linked-data-friendly. I suspect ORCID has limited staff that is swamped with work and LD is not a priority for them. I say give them a year or two to get up to

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote: On 3/12/13 11:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 3/12/13 10:57 AM, Jonathan A Rees wrote: Remember it took a while for DOIs to become linked-data-friendly. I suspect ORCID has limited staff that is swamped with

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
(Thanks anyone for helpful comments!) On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenb...@gmail.com wrote: Not to be too much of a stickler, but that isn't a spec, and isn't a clear statement. For instance the scope of unique isn't clear, and I can, with little effort, imagine a

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Gudmundur A. Thorisson
Hi all. Thanks a bunch to @hvdsomp for highlighting this discussion on Twitter earlier. Here's a collective response from the ORCID camp, which includes Laure (executive director), Laura (technical director), Rob (lead developer), myself and others involved in day-to-day operations in one way

Re: ORCID no longer relevant?

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 12:48 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: (Thanks anyone for helpful comments!) On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenb...@gmail.com wrote: Not to be too much of a stickler, but that isn't a spec, and isn't a clear statement. For instance the scope of unique isn't

loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kalpa Gunaratna
Hi, I have an rdf dump that has data in the form of .rdf files. I want to load them into a local Virtuoso server so that I can query them using the local sparql endpoint. But I see that it is possible to load one RDF/XML file at a time using the command DB.DBA.RDF_LOAD_RDFXML_MT. Since the dump

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Francisco Cifuentes
Take a look here: http://www.openlinksw.com/dataspace/doc/dav/wiki/Main/VirtBulkRDFLoader Regards Francisco. 2013/3/12 Kalpa Gunaratna kalpagunara...@gmail.com Hi, I have an rdf dump that has data in the form of .rdf files. I want to load them into a local Virtuoso server so that I can

Call for Workshops and Tutorials: International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2013)!

2013-03-12 Thread Mark Newman
Apologies for cross-postings. Please send it to interested colleagues and students. Thanks! CALL FOR WORKSHOPS and TUTORIALS ** International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2013) Technical Co-Sponsored

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kalpa Gunaratna
actually I tried that (I used the procedure to load DBpedia dump 3.8 which was in gz format as I remember.) But when I try to load now a dump of DBLP which has .rdf files as the dump when I uncompress it, I do not know how to load the files. Following is what I get running bulk load procedure.

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 4:36 PM, Kalpa Gunaratna wrote: actually I tried that (I used the procedure to load DBpedia dump 3.8 which was in gz format as I remember.) But when I try to load now a dump of DBLP which has .rdf files as the dump when I uncompress it, I do not know how to load the files.

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Francisco Cifuentes
An idea, try to indicate a file extension such as '*.n3' or *.rdf instead of *.* 2013/3/12 Kalpa Gunaratna kalpagunara...@gmail.com actually I tried that (I used the procedure to load DBpedia dump 3.8 which was in gz format as I remember.) But when I try to load now a dump of DBLP which has

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Barry Norton
Such questions really belong on the Virtuoso list, but don't most triplestores support the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol by now? Most of my (bash) load scripts look like this: for file in *; do curl -H Content-Type:text/turtle -T $file

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kalpa Gunaratna
Thank you all for replying and sorry for posting in this group. The problem I think was due to a processing of character by an editor (I used a google doc to write my commands and it interpreted ' symbol differently - transformed into a different character. So virtuoso didn't understand it as a

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 4:53 PM, Barry Norton wrote: Such questions really belong on the Virtuoso list, but don't most triplestores support the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol by now? Yes, but when you've got a massive collection of RDF files you still need to bulk load from a local directory etc.. Most

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Barry Norton
On 12/03/13 21:49, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 3/12/13 4:53 PM, Barry Norton wrote: Such questions really belong on the Virtuoso list, but don't most triplestores support the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol by now? Yes, but when you've got a massive collection of RDF files you still need to bulk

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Barry Norton
In fact thanks for the push, Kingsley. That does 'just work' using the standards HTTP and SPARQL Graph Store Protocol: $ curl -iX POST -H Content-Type:text/turtle -H Content-Encoding: gzip -T DBpediaArtists.nt.gz

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 6:33 PM, Barry Norton wrote: On 12/03/13 21:49, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 3/12/13 4:53 PM, Barry Norton wrote: Such questions really belong on the Virtuoso list, but don't most triplestores support the SPARQL Graph Store Protocol by now? Yes, but when you've got a massive

Re: loading multiple .rdf files into a local virtuoso server

2013-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/12/13 6:53 PM, Barry Norton wrote: In fact thanks for the push, Kingsley. That does 'just work' using the standards HTTP and SPARQL Graph Store Protocol: $ curl -iX POST -H Content-Type:text/turtle -H Content-Encoding: gzip -T DBpediaArtists.nt.gz

Early Call for ISWC2013 Participation

2013-03-12 Thread Armin.Haller
The 12th International Semantic Web Conference and the 1st Australasian Semantic Web Conference 21-25 October 2013, Sydney, Australia http://iswc2013.semanticweb.org Early Call for ISWC2013 Participation