On 27-6-2013 0:12, Alvaro Graves wrote:
Hi Frans,
I think there is a chicken-and-egg problem there. Governments won't
release Linked Data since they don't see the value of doing so because
nobody uses it (at least that's what employees from several government
have told me).
That could be a
** Apologies for cross-posting **
Last Call for Papers
SWAIE 2013: Semantic Web and Information Extraction
http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/swaie2013/
Full-day workshop in conjunction with RANLP 2013
Deadline: 3 July 2013, 23:59
Dear Frans and Alvaro and others,
Fortunately the Eureopean Union is pushing towards open science and all
relevant infrastructures to support this. In the new Horizon 2020 research
funding program enough space will be available to help address some of the
issues described by Frans.
It may
Hi,
On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
peer-reviewed Linked Data Glossary published as a W3C Working Group Note
effective 27-June-2013.[1]
We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containing terms defined and
used to describe Linked Data, and
Great work ! Thank you for putting this together. I hope this will put at
rest some of the terminology discussions that occurred over the last weeks.
Sincerely
Stephane Fellah
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bernadette Hyland
bhyl...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of the editors,
Bernadette and all,
Congrats! This is an amazing resource. I'm so happy to see all of the terms
finally in one place.
Also glad to see that R2RML is there. But Direct Mapping [1] is missing.
Any chance it could be added in the next iteration?
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/
Juan
Hi Bernadette
Great job. What about a publication of the glossary as linked data? In SKOS
for example :)
Bernard
*Bernard Vatant
*
Vocabularies Data Engineering
Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
Blog : the wheel and the hub http://bvatant.blogspot.com
Linked Open
Bernard,
I was thinking the same thing. If it is not done, I would be interested to
participate in this effort.
Stephane Fellah
smartRealm LLC
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com
wrote:
Hi Bernadette
Great job. What about a publication of the
Hi Bernard, Stephane, all
Great job. What about a publication of the glossary as linked data? In
SKOS for example :)
We had a discussion on that within the group [1] and the group decided
not to do, but encourage people to republish the glossary as LD as long
as it conforms to good stable URI
Dear all, after our jailbreaking the pdf hackathon we are pleased to
let you know about our participation at the hack4ac meeting in London.
more information about the meeting can be found at http://hack4ac.com
You are all welcome to join us in London, we will be very happy if we
could know and
I'm already signed up for hack4ac. I look forward to meeting you there!
Michelle
@MLBrook
On 27 Jun 2013, at 18:26, Alexander Garcia Castro alexgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all, after our jailbreaking the pdf hackathon we are pleased to
let you know about our participation at the
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland bhyl...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group
Note effective 27-June-2013.[1]
We hope this document serves as a
On Jun 27, 2013, at 13:18, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Hi Bernard, Stephane, all
Great job. What about a publication of the glossary as linked data? In
SKOS for example :)
We had a discussion on that within the group [1] and the group decided not to
do, but
hi all,
sorry - this was written in a haste. If I had actually read what I have quoted,
I would have known that the Collections Ontology was also designed to make
OWL DL compatible collections.
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:15:18PM +0200, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hi David,
How about publishing it on dir.w3.org using a W3C namespace?
I don't understand how it could be done on comDir. Directly as a product of
W3C? Or like other suggested before?
At the moment in dir.w3.org, when you click on W3C, under Project, you can
reach the Glossary itself after
15 matches
Mail list logo
